Authors
- Kelvin MwitaMzumbe Universityhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-6990
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1842Keywords:
qualitative research, quantitative research, mixed researchAbstract
Novice and experienced researchers may encounter numerous methodological challenges when it comes to data collection. Data have to be collected from the right sources using appropriate data collection tools to make research studies impactful. There are numerous data collection methods that researchers may use but not all methods are appropriate for all research studies. Choosing inappropriate research methods may result in invalid research findings and lead to erroneous conclusions. This means researchers have to carefully choose data collection methods to make their studies achieve their respective goals. This study intended to identify factors that researchers have to consider in choosing data collection methods. A systematic literature review was used to analyze 28 journal articles published between 2018 and 2022. From the analysis the study identified ten (10) factors that researchers have to consider in choosing data collection methods. These factors are; the research goal, the scope of the study, sample size, type of data, time and user-friendliness to the subjects. Other factors are research approach, safety and security of a researcher, the need for triangulation and theoretical framework. Before choosing methods for data collection, it is important to put into consideration these factors to increase the chances of achieving research objectives and answering research questions of research projects.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Agha, S. (2019). Effect of simulation-based education for learning in Medical Students: A mixed study method. J Pak Med Assoc, 69(4), 546-548.
Arifin, S.R.M. (2018). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2), 30-33.
Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 21:63-64.
Bellhouse, C., emple-Smith, M. J., & Bilardi, J. E. (2018). “It’s just one of those things people don’t seem to talk about...” women’s experiences of social support following miscarriage: a qualitative study. BMC Women's Health, 18, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0672-3
Brown, A. W., Kaiser, K. A., & Allison, D. B. (2018). Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions. PNAS, 115 (11), 2563–2570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708279115.
Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2(14),1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.
Califf, C. B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 809-856. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818.
Carberry, C., McCombe, G., Tobin, H. et al.. (2021). Curriculum initiatives to enhance research skills acquisition by medical students: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02754-0.
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE open medicine, 7, 2050312118822927. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
Collins, C. S. & Stockton, C. M (2018). The Central Role of Theory in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475.
Corwin, A. I. (2018). Overcoming Elderspeak: A Qualitative Study of Three Alternatives. Gerontologist, 58(4), 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx009.
Dehghani, A. (2020). Factors affecting professional ethics development in students: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics, 27(2), 461–469.10.1177/0969733019845135.
Fasoulis, L., & Kurt, R. E. (2019). Determinants to the implementation of corporate social responsibility in the maritime industry: a quantitative study, Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 3(1), 10-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2018.1563320.
Gilakjani, A. P., Sheikhy, R., Montashery, I., & Alizadeh, M. (2019). A Mixed Method Study of Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computer Pronunciation Software in Teaching English Pronunciation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 822-839.
Haand, R., & Shuwang, Z. (2020). The relationship between social media addiction and depression: a quantitative study among university students in Khost, Afghanistan. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25:1, 780-786, https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1741407.
Heath, J., Williamson, H., Williams, L., & Harcourt, D. (2018). “It's just more personal”: Using multiple methods of qualitative data collection to facilitate participation in research focusing on sensitive subjects. Applied Nursing Research, 43, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2018.06.015.
Hendriarto, P., Mursidi, A., Kalbuana, N., Aini, N., & Aslan, A. (2021). Understanding the Implications of Research Skills Development Framework for Indonesian Academic Outcomes Improvement. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v6i2.1405.
Hennink, M. M., . Kaiser, B. N. & Weber, M. B. (2019). What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research. Qualitative Health Research, 29(10), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692.
Humphreys, H., Kilby, L., Kudiersky, N., & Copeland, R. (2020). Long COVID and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study. BMJ Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-047632
Kalogirou, M. R., Dahlke, S., Davidson, S., & Yamamoto, S. (2021). Integrating planetary health into healthcare: A document analysis. Health policy, 125, 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.002.
König, A., & Dreßler, A. (2021). A mixed-methods analysis of mobility behavior changes in the COVID-19 era in a rural case study. European Transport Research Review, 13(15), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00472-8 .
Leisterer, S., & Jekauc, D. (2019). Students’ Emotional Experience in Physical Education—A Qualitative Study for New Theoretical Insights. Sports, 7(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7010010.
Lewis-Smith, I., Pass, L., & Reynolds, S. (2020). How adolescents understand their values: A qualitative study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(1), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104520964506.
Mkandawire, S. B. (2019). Selected Common Methods and Tools for Data Collection in Research. In: M. K. Banja (Ed.). Selected Readings in Education Volume 2. (pp.143-153)
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77
Mwita, K. M. (2020). Effects of corona virus pandemic (COVID-19) on selected human resource management practices in Tanzania. East African Journal of Social and Applied Sciences, 2(2), 252-259.
Neufeld, A., & Malin, G. (2019). Exploring the relationship between medical student basic psychological need satisfaction, resilience, and well-being: a quantitative study. BMC Medical Education, 19, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1847-9.
Okumah, M., Yeboah, A. S., Nkiaka, E., & Azerigyik, R. A. (2019). What Determines Behaviours Towards Water Resources Management in a Rural Context? Results of a Quantitative Study. Resources, 8, 1-19, doi:10.3390/resources8020109.
Policarpo, V., Romano, S., António, J.H.C., Correia, T.S., & Costa, Z. (2019). A new model for pharmacies? Insights from a quantitative study regarding the public’s perceptions. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3987-3.
Radovic, A., McCarty, C. A., Katzman, K., & Richardson, L. P. (2018). Adolescents’ Perspectives on Using Technology for Health: Qualitative Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent, 1(1), 1-13.
Ramachandiran, M., & Dhanapal, S. (2018). Academic Stress Among University Students: A Quantitative Study of Generation Y and Z’s Perception. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humunities, 26 (3): 2115 – 2128.
Ruiz-Parrado, V., Heradio, R., Aranda-Escolastico, E., Sánchez, A., & Vélez, J. F. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of off-line handwritten document analysis literature (1990–2020). Pattern Recognition, 125, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108513.
Sommerhoff, D., Szameitat, A., Vogel, F., Chernikova, O., Loderer, K. & Fischer, F. (2018) What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2),319-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353.
Sony, M., Antony, J., & Naik, S. (2020). How do organisations implement an effective LSS initiative? A qualitative study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(5), 1657-1681. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2019-0451
Spitzman, E. (2019). Social Justice in Action: A Document Analysis of the Integration of Social Justice Principles into Teaching. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i5.25071.
Sun, N., Wei, L., Wang, H., Wang, X., Gao, M., Hu, X., & Shi,S., (2021). Qualitative study of the psychological experience of COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. Journal of Affective Disorders, 278, 15-22.
Weber, J., Skodda, S., Muth, T., Angerer, P., & Loerbroks, A. (2019). Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 19, 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z.
Wunderlich, P., & Veit, D. (2019). Adoption of sustainable technologies: A mixed methods study of German households. MIS Quarterly. 43(2), 673-691. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/12112.
Yin, R, K. (2014). Qualitative Research: From Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.
