Widespread Public Support Bolsters Bill to End Restrictions on Abortion Coverage (2024)

Widespread Public Support Bolsters Bill to End Restrictions on Abortion Coverage (1)

At the very moment that a GOP-lead House subcommittee voted to further punish those in need by slashing $125 billion in federal food assistance funding, three Democratic congresswomen and their 70 congressional cosponsors announced the introduction of legislation this week to end 39 years of discrimination against the poor through abortion funding bans like the Hyde Amendment.

Since 1976, the annually renewed Hyde Amendment has prohibited the use of federal funds to cover abortion care for the one in six women of reproductive age (15 to 44) insured through Medicaid. Hyde, in conjunction with recent laws severely restricting or prohibiting abortion coverage in 25 states, even for some private insurance plans, has led one in four low-income US residents to carry unintended pregnancies to term against their wills.

The EACH Woman Act would nullify existing abortion coverage bans while preventing future legislation from blocking access to low-income people.

Reps. Barbara Lee (D-California), Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois), Diana DeGette (D-Colorado) and the 36 state and national organizations united under the All* Above All campaign announced Wednesday that they are seeking to end this injustice and reverse the recent trend of anti-abortion legislation with the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance Act, or EACH Woman Act. The bill extends coverage to Medicaid recipients, and it also restores the constitutional right to abortion for employees of the federal government and their dependents, residents of the District of Columbia, Peace Corps volunteers, Native Americans, federal prisoners and detainees (including those detained for immigration purposes), and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) enrollees.

The EACH Woman Act would nullify existing abortion coverage bans at the state and federal level while preventing future legislation from recreating the disparity in access between low-income people and those with means. Because the policies currently in place disproportionately punish the already disadvantaged, the primary beneficiaries of this first-of-its-kind legislation would be youth, poor residents in rural areas with additional logistical barriers to abortion care, and people of color.

“This legislation would ensure that every woman can access all of her health-care options, regardless of how much money she earns or where she lives,” Lee said in her statement at Wednesday’s press conference. “Regardless of how someone personally feels about abortion, none of us, especially elected officials, should be interfering with a woman’s right to make her own health-care decision just because she is poor.”

Public Support for Abortion Access

According to a new poll from Hart Research Associates conducted on behalf of All* Above All, voters in nearly every demographic combination – age, party affiliation, religious background, ethnicity – agree with Lee and would support legislation like the EACH Woman Act.

By a 24-point margin (59 percent to 35 percent), more voters align with the statement: “However we feel about abortion, politicians should not be allowed to deny a woman insurance coverage for it just because she is poor” than with the statement: “Using taxpayer dollars for abortions forces all of us to pay for them – even people who don’t believe in abortion.”

Flying in the face of ideologically motivated, well-funded legislators and anti-abortion talking heads, Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of repealing abortion funding bans or – at the very least – staying out of their neighbors’ business. Double-digit majorities among Democrats (85 percent), Independents (75 percent), and Republicans (62 percent) go even further, agreeing that “as long as abortion is legal, the amount of money a woman has or does not have should not prevent her from being able to have an abortion.”

With such strong support for bodily autonomy and empowerment, it’s striking that funding bans have been added to every federal budget for a generation and signed by presidents of both parties. Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Illinois) was up front about the motivation for his amendment the year after it first passed, making its annual reintroduction an indictment on our elected officials and political system up to this point.

“I certainly would like to prevent, if I could legally, anybody having an abortion, a rich woman, a middle-class woman or a poor woman,” Hyde said in 1977. “Unfortunately, the only vehicle available is the … Medicaid bill.”

Unable to oppress all people who might need access to an abortion, Hyde and his cohorts settled for punishing the group whose rights are always the first to get traded away: the poor. While those who regularly do without basic needs might be used to seeing their rights on the chopping block, eliminating access to abortion care has the potential to do more than just make someone’s life more difficult or uncomfortable.

Representative Schakowsky acknowledged the real-world impact of ensuring abortion care is out of reach for millions of people at Wednesday’s press conference.

“Roe v. Wade wasn’t the beginning of abortion,” she said. “It was the end of women dying from abortions.”

A Small Step in the Face of New Abortion Restrictions

We know from US history that placing abortion out of reach for entire segments of the population has deadly effects. An estimated 5,000 people died annually in this country during abortion prohibition despite the 0.05 percent chance a medically competent, safe abortion will result in a complication of any kind requiring hospital follow-up care.

The movement for true reproductive justice is experiencing a groundswell, due in no small part to the leadership of young people of color, queer youth and unflinching organizers from historically red states.

That this legacy is being addressed by elected officials in Washington after decades of stigma-reinforcing language like “safe, legal and rare” and reluctance to risk political pushback in the defense of a constitutional right makes the introduction of legislation like the EACH Woman Act a culturally monumental moment. And it’s happening on the heels of anti-choice legislators having their way with hardly a whisper of pushback.

From 2010-2014 an onslaught of 231 abortion restrictions were signed into law, creating abortion clinic deserts of hundreds and even thousands of miles all over the country. This onslaught continues: Bills to further limit access and increase cost were introduced in 43 states just in the first quarter of this year.

In this political climate, the introduction of legislation that recognizes the constitutional and human rights of poor people is a social justice action.

“Being able to have an abortion is so much more than abortion being technically legal,” said Yamani Hernandez, executive director of the National Network of Abortion Funds, one of the organizations leading the movement to end funding bans, in a conversation with Truthout.

“It’s about making communities safe enough for us to raise all of our children and having the financial resources to ensure those kids are healthy and thriving,” Hernandez added. “The Hyde Amendment and coverage bans that discriminate based on how much money someone has or where they live are deeply unjust, and we will continue to be the voices speaking that truth because we are fighting for the right to live our lives with dignity and autonomy.”

Agitating for Reproductive Justice

“Community” and “justice” were referenced throughout Wednesday’s press conference by the bill’s congressional sponsors and supporters from the All* Above All coalition, including the woman facilitating the announcement, Jessica González-Rojas, executive director of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health.

“The EACH Woman Act advances access to reproductive health care and so much more,” González-Rojas told Truthout. “Abortion coverage is a reproductive justice issue – and it’s also an economic justice issue, a civil rights issue and a health equity issue. As we build the movement to lift coverage bans, we are excited to be working alongside social justice leaders from many movements to make real change for our communities.”

The movement for true reproductive justice is experiencing a groundswell, due in no small part to the leadership of young people of color, queer youth and unflinching organizers from historically red states who’ve watched as their rights have eroded rapidly during their lifetime.

“Young people and people of color are tired of bearing the brunt of policies that disenfranchise them and their decision-making,” Kierra Johnson, executive director of Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity (URGE), told Truthout as she described the diversity in her organization. URGE is a member of the All* Above All campaign coalition.

The majority of Americans are in support of lifting these bans on abortion coverage.

“The young people that are drawn into this movement today don’t see reproductive justice as wholly separate from LGBTQ equality – or, for that matter, separate from racial justice or economic justice or a host of other social justice issues,” said Johnson. “These issues are interconnected, just as the lives and identities of young people are interconnected. That’s the way that young people want to work on these issues, and that’s the way URGE works.”

Johnson, González-Rojas and Hernandez each referenced the need for proactive, rights-affirming legislation like the EACH Woman Act as they described the impact of having a technical right, with no practical means for exercising it, has on their communities.

“Our member funds … answer calls every day from people who need abortions who are prohibited from getting what they need because of an unjust system that doesn’t trust those with less money to make their own decisions about their lives,” said Hernandez.

Support from Religious Communities

One All* Above All coalition member backing the legislation adds a religious imperative to the fight for reproductive justice – an important contribution because over three-quarters of Americans identify with an organized religion.

“Compassion, which is common throughout most religions, is the cornerstone of a just and righteous society. You cannot love someone and treat them unfairly,” Rev. Harry Knox, president and CEO of Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, told Truthout.

“All of us, not just some, should have the reproductive health care to live our lives as the whole and healthy people we were created to be. All women and families, not just some, must be fully empowered with the tools and resources needed to decide whether, when, and under what circ*mstances to have children and to raise their children in healthy environments.”

Knox said he wasn’t surprised at the polling data showing broad support for legislation like the EACH Woman Act to repeal abortion coverage bans.

“Most people realize that decisions about how and under what circ*mstances to become a parent are sacred and personal, and best made by a woman with her family and faith in mind,” said Knox. “We also know that targeting poor and working-class women is wrong. Women with fewer resources shouldn’t have inferior care.”

Raising Awareness

Johnson explained that the biggest barrier to introducing the EACH Woman Act and beginning the work of building support among voters was simple awareness.

“Research shows that the majority of Americans are in support of lifting these bans on abortion coverage, but many aren’t aware of this problem,” she said. “The EACH Woman Act will raise awareness of this issue and continue to build our broad coalition of those who want to get rid of these bans once and for all.”

Knox articulated not only why repealing bans is an imperative, but also why basic education builds support: Withholding access to care to individuals punishes the poor and working class – and it affects everyone.

“Many of these women [affected by coverage bans] are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Forcing her to carry the pregnancy to term can push her deeper into poverty,” he said. “When women with low incomes have insurance that covers birth control and abortion – not just childbirth – they can plan if and when to have children. That’s good for them, it’s good for their children, and it’s good for society as a whole.”

Johnson expressed tempered optimism about passing a coverage ban repeal with an eye beyond the current GOP-control Congress and its hostility toward reproductive health.

“It’s a new majority that is refusing to be disenfranchised and fighting for the right to thrive. Young people have always been integral to the reproductive justice movement, but this campaign puts them in the spotlight and at the center of the solution,” said Johnson. “No matter what happens with the EACH Woman Act, the momentum of this campaign will not go away.”

The future of our journalism depends on you.

Thank you for reading Truthout. Whether you’re a long-time reader or a first-time visitor, we need to make a request of you today.

Truthout is one of few truly independent news publications left. We’ve been able to publish stories like this one for over twenty years because of donations from readers like you.

At this moment, we’re working to increase our monthly recurring donations, gifts that form a critical core of our operating expenses. We hope to add $200 in monthly gifts in the next 24 hours. If you can support us in this way, please make a monthly donation in any amount.

One-time donations are also vital – anything you can give makes a difference.

Widespread Public Support Bolsters Bill to End Restrictions on Abortion Coverage (2024)

FAQs

What is SB 245 the abortion accessibility act? ›

Senate Bill (SB) 245, the Abortion Accessibility Act, will require all state-licensed health care service plans or disability insurance policies issued after 2022, to cover abortion services without a co-payment, deductible, or any type of cost-sharing requirement.

What is the Hyde Amendment and coverage for abortion services? ›

In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortion, except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.

When was the Hyde Amendment passed? ›

Since the Hyde Amendment passed in 1976, anti-choice politicians have added abortion coverage and funding bans to appropriations language that restricts: Medicaid, Medicare and Children's Health Insurance Program enrollees; Federal employees and their dependents; Peace Corps volunteers; Native Americans; women in ...

What is the Hyde Amendment 1977? ›

Starting in 1977, the Hyde Amendment has banned the use of any federal funds for abortion, only allowing exceptions to pay for terminating pregnancies that endanger the life of the woman, or that result from rape or incest.

What is the sb8 abortion law? ›

Senate Bill 8 is also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act. It prohibits a physician from performing or inducing an abortion after a "fetal heartbeat" has been detected. The law makes exceptions for medical emergencies. This law did not make performing or inducing an abortion a crime.

What is the SB 128 End of Life Option Act? ›

The End of Life Option Act (EOLA) allows an adult diagnosed with a terminal disease, who meets certain qualifications, to request the aid-in-dying drugs from their attending physician. The Act requires physicians to submit specified forms and information to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).

What is the Weldon Amendment? ›

The Weldon Amendment bars funding by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from going to federal agencies and programs or state and local governments that “discriminate” against health insurance plans, health care institutions or health care professionals that refuse to “provide, pay for, provide ...

What is equal access to abortion coverage? ›

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives on January 26 introduced the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance (EACH) Act, a federal bill to ensure that people who receive health care or insurance through the federal government have coverage for abortion care.

Are abortions covered by insurance in Virginia? ›

Abortion services may be covered by your insurance. Please let us know that you would like to use your insurance when you schedule your appointment. If you are uninsured, you may be eligible to receive financial assistance for your procedure.

What is the no taxpayer funding for abortion act? ›

January 25, 2023

“The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act would simplify federal rules, ensuring that American tax dollars are never used for the destruction of innocent, unborn life.” For over 40 years, an inconsistent and haphazard set of policies have regulated federal funding for abortion.

What was the problem with the Hyde Amendment? ›

A dissenting Supreme Court opinion recognized that the Hyde Amendment was discriminatory. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's dissenting opinion in Harris v. McRae noted that the law was “designed to deprive poor and minority women of the constitutional right to choose abortion.”

When was the 22nd Amendment put into law? ›

Amendment Twenty-two to the Constitution was ratified on February 27, 1951. It establishes term limits on those elected president, and outlines an accompanying series of stipulations regarding the eligibility of succession for unfinished presidential terms.

What did the 1976 Hyde Amendment put into place? ›

In 1976, the US Congress passed the Hyde Amendment, which banned the use of federal funding to pay for abortions through Medicaid. In 1976, Illinois Congressman Henry J. Hyde proposed the amendment to the Departments of Labor and Health, Education, and Welfare, Appropriation Act of 1977.

Is the Hyde Amendment still in place? ›

In 1978, Congress added exceptions if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest and applied the amendment to other federal programs. Both new conditions are still in place. The Hyde Amendment...prohibits the use of federal funding for abortion except in select cases.

What is the Women's health Protection Act 2024? ›

This bill prohibits governmental restrictions on the provision of, and access to, abortion services. immediately providing abortion services if delaying risks the patient's health.

What is the California Assembly Bill 245? ›

This bill would revise and recast the program's requirements of for training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid by, among other things, adding, by July 1 1, 2024, requiring training in recognizing and responding to the signs and symptoms of cardiac arrest arrest.

What is the Equal Access to abortion Coverage Act? ›

The EACH Act restores abortion coverage to those: enrolled in a government health insurance plan (i.e., Medicaid, Medicare), including those who live in the District of Columbia; enrolled in a government-managed health insurance program (i.e., FEHBP, TRICARE) due to an employment relationship; or.

What is SB 24 California abortion? ›

That's why we're supporting the College Student Right to Access Act (SB 24), which will make sure California's university students have access to the abortion pill. The abortion pill is safe, effective care that can – and should – be offered at every California university health center.

What is the Maryland abortion access act? ›

Abortion is legal throughout pregnancy in Maryland – there is no ban or limit on abortion in Maryland based on how far along in pregnancy you are. If you are under the age of 18, a parent or guardian must be notified beforehand of your decision to get an abortion.

Top Articles
Why You Should NOT Keep a Wallet or Phone in Your Back Pocket | NSC
About Us | Onyx by J.P.Morgan
Mybranch Becu
Kostner Wingback Bed
Rosy Boa Snake — Turtle Bay
Kem Minnick Playboy
Craigslist Vans
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle SS - Skyway Classics
Gameplay Clarkston
Clafi Arab
Prices Way Too High Crossword Clue
Declan Mining Co Coupon
Find The Eagle Hunter High To The East
Elle Daily Horoscope Virgo
Jscc Jweb
Used Wood Cook Stoves For Sale Craigslist
OSRS Dryness Calculator - GEGCalculators
RBT Exam: What to Expect
Cinebarre Drink Menu
Equipamentos Hospitalares Diversos (Lote 98)
Stardew Expanded Wiki
Bing Chilling Words Romanized
My Homework Lesson 11 Volume Of Composite Figures Answer Key
Healthier Homes | Coronavirus Protocol | Stanley Steemer - Stanley Steemer | The Steem Team
ABCproxy | World-Leading Provider of Residential IP Proxies
Rufus Benton "Bent" Moulds Jr. Obituary 2024 - Webb & Stephens Funeral Homes
Georgia Cash 3 Midday-Lottery Results & Winning Numbers
Defending The Broken Isles
Piri Leaked
15 Primewire Alternatives for Viewing Free Streams (2024)
Cable Cove Whale Watching
Harrison 911 Cad Log
Spirited Showtimes Near Marcus Twin Creek Cinema
FREE Houses! All You Have to Do Is Move Them. - CIRCA Old Houses
El agente nocturno, actores y personajes: quién es quién en la serie de Netflix The Night Agent | MAG | EL COMERCIO PERÚ
Wsbtv Fish And Game Report
Myfxbook Historical Data
Ludvigsen Mortuary Fremont Nebraska
Sunrise Garden Beach Resort - Select Hurghada günstig buchen | billareisen.at
Search All of Craigslist: A Comprehensive Guide - First Republic Craigslist
Craigs List Palm Springs
Simnet Jwu
Craigslist Mendocino
Sky Dental Cartersville
Horseneck Beach State Reservation Water Temperature
Barber Gym Quantico Hours
Shiftselect Carolinas
Ret Paladin Phase 2 Bis Wotlk
San Pedro Sula To Miami Google Flights
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Last Updated:

Views: 5870

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Birthday: 1997-10-17

Address: Suite 835 34136 Adrian Mountains, Floydton, UT 81036

Phone: +3571527672278

Job: Manufacturing Agent

Hobby: Skimboarding, Photography, Roller skating, Knife making, Paintball, Embroidery, Gunsmithing

Introduction: My name is Lakeisha Bayer VM, I am a brainy, kind, enchanting, healthy, lovely, clean, witty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.