What to Expect at Federal Revocation of Supervised Release Hearings

Contents

1 What to Expect at Federal Revocation of Supervised Release Hearings
- 1.1 The Basics of Supervised Release
- 1.2 Revocation Process Overview
- 1.3 Initial Appearance
- 1.4 Revocation Hearing
- 1.5 Sentencing Hearing
- 1.6 Key Defense Strategies
- 1.7 Conclusion

When a person on federal supervised release allegedly violates their supervision conditions, they face revocation proceedings that could result in being sent back to prison. So what exactly happens at federal revocation hearings? This article provides an overview of the process and key things to know.

The Basics of Supervised Release

First, some background. Supervised release is a period of community supervision that follows a federal prison sentence. Judges impose supervised release terms of one to five years (sometimes more). The purpose is to facilitate the person’s transition back into society.

Supervised release comes with conditions like reporting to a probation officer, maintaining employment, not using illegal drugs, etc. Violating these conditions can lead to revocation and imprisonment.

Revocation Process Overview

The revocation process involves three main steps:

Initial Appearance: A hearing to determine if there is probable cause a violation occurred.
Revocation Hearing: The main hearing where evidence is presented and the judge decides on revocation.
Sentencing Hearing: If revocation happens, this hearing determines the imprisonment sentence.

Defense strategies focus on the revocation and sentencing hearings. However, understanding all steps provides useful context.

Initial Appearance

Federal probation officers must report Grade A or B violations to the court. This triggers an initial appearance hearing.

The purpose is solely to establish probable cause. The standard is lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. If probable cause exists, the next step is a revocation hearing.

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence.Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Revocation Hearing

Revocation hearings determine if a violation occurred. If so, the judge can revoke supervised release and order re-imprisonment.

Defendants have more rights at revocation versus initial hearings:

Written notice of alleged violations
Disclosure of evidence
Right to counsel
Opportunity to testify, present witnesses/evidence
Right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses

The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply at revocation hearings. Judges can consider hearsay and other normally inadmissible evidence.

If the judge finds a violation occurred, possible outcomes include:

Continuing supervised release (potentially with modified conditions)
Revocation and reimprisonment

Mandatory revocation applies in certain situations like firearm possession. Judges also often revoke for new felony arrests.

Sentencing Hearing

If the judge revokes supervised release, a sentencing hearing follows to determine imprisonment length. Terms can be up to the maximum available for the original offense.

However, research shows relatively few people revoked solely for “technical violations” (e.g. failed drug tests, missed meetings with probation officer) get long prison terms.

Sentencing hearings resemble initial federal sentencing hearings, including factors judges consider in determining sentences. The defense can present mitigating evidence arguing against a lengthy term.

Key Defense Strategies

Defense strategies in revocation proceedings focus on two main goals:

Avoid revocation by contesting violations occurred.
Mitigate sentencing through presenting evidence arguing against lengthy reimprisonment.

Common strategies toward these goals include:

Negotiating with probation – Discuss cases informally, address violations, advocate against revocation referrals
Contesting violations – Argue insufficient proof, credibility issues with government witnesses
Alternative resolutions – Propose modifying supervision terms versus revocation
Mitigation evidence – Gather letters, records showing positive conduct and arguing against prison

The strongest approach combines multiple strategies tailored to the specifics of each case.

Conclusion

Revocation of federal supervised release can result in substantial imprisonment. But defense strategies exist to avoid or minimize consequences.

Understanding the process, rights available, and typical outcomes provides useful context. This can help guide effective responses if accused of violating supervision.

The stakes are high. Those facing revocation should consult defense counsel to explore options. This provides the best chance at avoiding or minimizing reimprisonment.

What to Expect at Federal Revocation of Supervised Release Hearings - 2024 - FEDERAL LAWYERS [2024] (2024)