VYM vs. VOO — ETF comparison tool (2024)

FAQs

VYM vs. VOO — ETF comparison tool? ›

Both VYM and VOO are considered high-volume assets. They're less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets. VYM has more assets under management than VOO by $277,247,757,306. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.

VYM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.03% for VOO. VYM is up 12.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$173M in YTD flows. VOO performs better with 18.7% YTD performance, and +$48.81B in YTD flows.

Average Return

In the past year, VOO returned a total of 24.20%, which is lower than VUG's 26.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has had annualized average returns of 12.66% , compared to 14.71% for VUG. These numbers are adjusted for stock splits and include dividends.

Average Return

In the past year, SPLG returned a total of 27.23%, which is slightly lower than VOO's 27.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLG has had annualized average returns of 12.80% , compared to 12.93% for VOO. These numbers are adjusted for stock splits and include dividends.

While the two ETFs follow the same strategy, they earn different ratings. VOO earns a top rating of Gold, while SPY earns the next best rating of Silver. Almahasneh says the reason is fees and inefficiencies of the unit investment trust structure.

To mark an ETF for comparison, click on the box next to each ETF in the ETF screener in the search results. Alternatively, you can click on "Compare" in the ETF profile.

Is a schd or VOO better? ›

VOO has an advantage in expense ratio, with an expense ratio of 0.03%, whereas SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06%, which is double the cost of VOO. The industry average expense ratio is 0.25%, and VOO and SCHD are relatively inexpensive compared to other ETFs.

Bottom Line

VTI and VOO are both good picks for the long-term investor in need of a core U.S. equity fund. The main difference between the two is VTI's small and mid-cap holdings. If that exposure is appealing, VTI is your choice. Otherwise, go with VOO.

Low 2 bps Expense Ratio: Compared to other S&P 500® ETFs, SPLG boasts a significantly lower 2 bps expense ratio — which may translate to substantial savings over the long-term for cost-conscious investors.

QQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.03% for VOO. QQQ is up 12.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18.55B in YTD flows. VOO performs better with 13.58% YTD performance, and +$57.69B in YTD flows.

SCHX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.03% for VOO. SCHX is up 18.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.02B in YTD flows. VOO performs better with 18.7% YTD performance, and +$48.81B in YTD flows.

VYM has a consensus rating of Moderate Buy which is based on 332 buy ratings, 193 hold ratings and 28 sell ratings. What is VYM's price target? The average price target for VYM is $137.96. This is based on 553 Wall Streets Analysts 12-month price targets, issued in the past 3 months.

The Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares is a popular dividend growth ETF for retirees. The VYM ETF has a low expense ratio, long-term dividend growth, and a well-diversified portfolio.

VOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.09% for VFV. VOO is up 18.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48.81B in YTD flows. VFV performs better with 22.09% YTD performance, and +$3.33B in YTD flows.

10, 2024.