VOO vs. VUG — ETF Comparison - Stock Analysis (2024)

FAQs

VOO vs. VUG — ETF Comparison - Stock Analysis? ›

In the past year, VOO returned a total of 28.32%, which is lower than VUG's 32.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has had annualized average returns of 12.93% , compared to 15.18% for VUG. These numbers are adjusted for stock splits and include dividends.

Because of this, VUG is a great option for investors seeking exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Growth segment of the market. There are other additional ETFs in the space that investors could consider as well. The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and the Invesco QQQ (QQQ) track a similar index.

USA . At this time, the etf appears to be fairly valued. Vanguard Growth Index has a current Real Value of $364.96 per share. The regular price of the etf is $364.44.

Average Return

In the past year, VOO returned a total of 24.20%, which is lower than VUG's 26.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has had annualized average returns of 12.66% , compared to 14.71% for VUG. These numbers are adjusted for stock splits and include dividends.

QQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.04% for VUG. QQQ is up 20.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22.16B in YTD flows. VUG performs better with 23.54% YTD performance, and +$8.42B in YTD flows.

VUG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.03% for VTI. VUG is up 23.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8.42B in YTD flows. VTI performs worse with 17.53% YTD performance, and +$17.63B in YTD flows.

While the two ETFs follow the same strategy, they earn different ratings. VOO earns a top rating of Gold, while SPY earns the next best rating of Silver. Almahasneh says the reason is fees and inefficiencies of the unit investment trust structure.

What is Vanguard's best-performing ETF? ›

Best Vanguard Funds for Aggressive Investors: Vanguard Explorer (VEXPX) Click to Enlarge If you want to turn up the growth potential and you want to go all-the-way aggressive, look no further than Vanguard Explorer (MUTF:VEXPX).

VOO has an advantage in expense ratio, with an expense ratio of 0.03%, whereas SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06%, which is double the cost of VOO. The industry average expense ratio is 0.25%, and VOO and SCHD are relatively inexpensive compared to other ETFs.

QQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.03% for VOO. QQQ is up 12.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18.55B in YTD flows. VOO performs better with 13.58% YTD performance, and +$57.69B in YTD flows.

Diversification: VTI offers broader diversification by including companies of all sizes, while VOO's focus on large-cap companies may provide a slightly less diversified exposure. Performance: The performance of VTI and VOO can vary depending on the performance of the underlying indexes.

VGT has more assets under management than VOO by $275,692,984,564. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading. VGT and VOO use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.