The SHARE Approach: A Model for Shared Decisionmaking - Fact Sheet (2024)

FAQs

What is the share approach model for shared decisionmaking? ›

The SHARE Approach is a five-step process for shared decisionmaking that includes exploring and comparing the benefits, harms, and risks of each option through meaningful dialogue about what matters most to the patient.

The SHARE model involves breaking down each behavioural question into smaller chunks, as follows: Situation. Hindrance, or challenge. Action taken. Results achieved.

What is shared decision (SDM) making ? An approach or system where clinicians and patients communicate with each other to make decisions. patients are supported to make informed decisions while utilizing best available evidence.

Shared decision-making ensures that individuals are supported to make decisions that are right for them. It is a collaborative process through which a clinician supports a patient to reach a decision about their treatment.

Shared decision making is appropriate for decisions in both primary (GP) and secondary care (hospital) settings some examples include whether to: undergo a screening or diagnostic test. undergo a medical or surgical procedure. participate in a self-management education programme or psychological intervention.

Frameworks and Models in Shared Decision Making

describe three key steps of SDM for clinical practice, which they name: Team Talk, Option Talk, and Decision Talk. During Team Talk the care team describes choices, offers support, and asks about goals.

Aligning the Four Rs of Decision-Making: Results, Resources, Restrictions, Risk. Not all decisions require a high level of rigor.

The acronym SHARE makes it easy to remember the guidelines for structuring your responses: ​S​ituation, ​H​indrance, ​A​ction, ​R​esults, ​E​valuate.

What is the share approach in interviewing? ›

SHARE is an acronym that stands for situation, hinderance, action, results, and evaluate. The SHARE model can be employed to showcase relevant experience and communicate job specific skills to prospective employers during behavioral and competency-based job interviews.

SDM requires three components: Clear, accurate and unbiased medical evidence about the reasonable options and the risks, benefits, and burdens of each alternative, including no intervention. Clinician expertise in communication and tailoring that evidence for individual patients.

The aim of shared decisionmaking is to ensure that: Patients understand their options and the pros and cons of those options. Patient's goals and treatment preferences are used to guide decisions.

Shared Decision Making tools allow clinicians and our members to work together to make decisions and select medications that balance risks and expected outcomes with member preferences and values.

Through shared decision making, providers and patients can thoroughly discuss all possible side effects, outcomes, and treatment options. Shared decision making and decision aids can also help reduce the gap in treatment for patients who struggle to navigate health care systems.

In this overview we describe the three essential elements of shared decision making: recognizing and acknowledging that a decision is required; knowing and understanding the best available evidence; and incorporating the patient's values and preferences into the decision.

Shared governance is a professional practice model that ensures nurses have a voice in decisions affecting their practice and professional growth. It's not about nurses acting independently without regulation or oversight.

Schramm's model is based on the Shannon–Weaver model. According to the Shannon–Weaver model, communication is an interaction of various components. A source translates a message into a signal using a transmitter. The signal is then sent through a channel to a receiver.