The impact of digital economy on high-quality economic development: Research based on the consumption expansion (2024)

Xiaoxuan Li, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft^1,* and Qi Wu, Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing²

Digital economy and high-quality economic development

With digital technology as the core driving force, the digital economy can directly promote the dynamic, efficiency and quality transformation of economic and social development through information technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and cloud computing [33]. Regarding the research on the relationship between digital economy and high-quality economic development, scholars generally believe that the digital economy can positively promote high-quality economic development [34]. The theory of high-quality economic development is rich in connotation, and it is highly consistent with the five new development concepts proposed by China [35]. Industries related to the digital economy are characterized by high knowledge density and strong innovation attributes, and their development and utilization of new technologies, new methods and new products provide a solid digital foundation for high-quality economic development [36]. The digital economy can reduce the cost of key factors, exert the network radiation effect, improve the allocation efficiency of production factors, and ultimately improve the efficiency of regional resource allocation. We should give full play to the advantages of the digital economy in various regions, and use the spillover effect of the digital economy to drive the long-term development of less developed regions, so as to narrow the development gap between regions [37]. The digital economy can effectively transform the input and output mode of traditional production factors, and enhance the ability of resource integration and ecological environment governance. This helps to improve the combined efficiency of green production factors, which is reflected in the improvement of green total factor productivity [38]. With the in-depth development of digital technology, cross-border e-commerce, as an emerging force for expanding opening up, can strengthen economic and trade exchanges between countries. This is helpful to promoting regional economic integration [39]. The development of the digital economy has greatly improved the efficiency of matching supply and demand of the economy, expanded effective demand, and ensured a sufficient and diverse material base [40]. Based on this, we proposed hypothesis 1:

• H1: The digital economy can positively promote high-quality economic development.

The nonlinear influence

Compared with the traditional economy, the digital economy is the manifestation of the industrialization and marketization of the information technology revolution. Its development conforms to Metcalfe’s law, Moore’s law and Davido’s law [41]. This determines that the digital economy has the characteristics of increasing marginal returns and diminishing marginal costs. In the initial stage of the digital economy, the construction of digital infrastructure is incomplete, and the digital dividend cannot be effectively released, which converge to the limited promotion of high-quality economic development [42]. With the iterative upgrading of digital technology and the continuous development of digital industry, the transaction costs between economic entities and the marginal cost of digital technology Research and Development (R&D) continue to decline, and the scale returns of market entities increase. The economic benefits obtained from the digital economy increase exponentially, and the role of empowering the high-quality development will increase rapidly. With the continuous development of the digital economy and upgrading of the digital industrial structure, the potential of the digital economy will be gradually released. At this point, the force driving high-quality economic development will show the law of diminishing marginal utility. Accordingly, hypothesis 2 was proposed as:

• H2: The influence of digital economy on high-quality economic development is non-linear.

The impact of consumption expansion

Both the development of digital economy and consumption growth will impact on high-quality economic development. This impact path includes both consumer demand and consumption supply. For one thing, users can utilize the digital information platform to obtain commodity information in a more timely and effective manner, while reducing the cost of commodity information search and information asymmetry [43]. This effect enables consumers to make more rational purchase decisions, which leads to transactions and increased consumption. Meanwhile, digital industrialization has brought about the rapid development of online shopping platforms and digital logistics supply chains. This can effectively reduce the geographical boundaries and barriers of goods and services. Consumers’ shopping needs can be met faster and safer, and the time per purchase is shortened [44].

For another, through deep integration with traditional industries, the digital economy realizes digital transformation and accelerates the digital transformation of the consumption supply side [45]. Relying on the new division of labor mode and production mode formed by digital technology, market entities have significantly improved production efficiency and value chain, and ultimately increased the effective supply of the whole society [46]. The consumer demand can be better matched with consumption supply. Consumers’ constantly upgrading consumption demand can be quickly and effectively satisfied, which is conducive to achieving high-quality development [47]. Consequently, hypotheses 3 and 4 were proposed:

• H3: Under the regulation of consumption, there is a threshold effect on the impact of the digital economy on high-quality economic development.

• H4: Consumption expansion promotes high-quality economic development through the digital economy.

Models

Firstly, we constructed the benchmark individual fixed-effect model:

where hqe_it indicates the level of regional high-quality development index of the region i in the period of t. α₀ is the constant. digit_it is the digital economy index and digitit2 is the square of digit_it. control_it represents the control variables. u_i indicates individual fixed effects and ε_it is the random error.

The mediational effect model of digit economy was defined as follows.

Furthermore, we conducted the static panel threshold regression method. The threshold regression model is designed for non-dynamic panels with individual fixed effects, and refers to an econometric research method that causes structural mutations in another economic parameter when it reaches a certain value [48]. This method determines the threshold value by minimizing the sum of squares of the residuals. It uses a fixed-effect transformation and obtains the regression slope through least squares estimation. Taking use of the non-standard asymptotic theory for inference, this method allows to construct the confidence intervals for hypothesis testing, thereby overcoming the bias caused by the mutation of the subjective setting architecture.

Considering the theoretical analysis above, the following panel threshold model was constructed:

Eqs (5) and (6) indicate that there is a double threshold effect on the impact of the digital economy on high-quality economic development. cd_it and cs_it indicate the threshold variable consumption demand and consumption supply respectively. digit_it means the district dependent variable, which is the core explanatory variables affected by the threshold variable. μ_i and σ_i is the threshold to be estimated. I(∙) is the indicative function, and control_it represents the control variables.

Explained variable: high quality economic development index (hqe). The measurement of high-quality economic development is diversified and comprehensive. We constructed the index system from the five perspectives of innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing [49,50]. The entropy weight method was used to measure the index weight of the high-quality economic development index, and the results are shown in Table 1.

Explanatory variable: Regional Digital Economy Index (digit). We made use of the index system to measure the digital economy index, which was constructed from four dimensions: digital foundation, digital industry, digital integration, and digital innovation [51–54]. The index weight was calculated by the entropy weight method, and the results are shown in Table 2.

Control variables: In order to avoid the problem of multicollinearity due to too many control variables, we referred to previous researches and considered factors that may affect the high-quality economic development in the model as follows. (1) Degree of openness to the foreign countries (open), measured by the share of FDI in Gross Domestic Product (GDP). (2) Infrastructure construction (basein), measured by public transport vehicles per 10,000 people (standard station). (3) Government functions (govern), measured by the proportion of fiscal expenditure in total GDP.

Threshold variables: For consumption expansion, we analyzed the threshold effect of the digital economy in the path of high-quality economic development from the two aspects of consumer demand and consumption supply. The proportion of total household consumption to GDP was introduced as a proxy indicator of consumption demand (cd). As for the consumption supply (cs), we took the share of e-commerce turnover in GDP as the proxy variable.

Data

We selected data of 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2021 (excluding Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan). Data sources include China Statistical Yearbook, China Information Industry Yearbook, China Industrial Statistical Yearbook and the statistical yearbooks and statistical bulletins of the provinces. Missing data was interpolated by the expected mean. In order to eliminate the influence of dimensions and alleviate the estimation bias caused by the problem of heteroscedasticity, all variable indicators were made logarithmic to further enhance the stationarity of the data. The results of the descriptive statistics for variables are shown in Table 3.

Regression analysis and robustness testing

Firstly, based on the results of the Hausman test [55], we determined to implement the fixed-effect model. Among the individual fixed-effect models, the time fixed-effect model, and the individual-time dual fixed-effect model, the result was found to be most significant by using the individual fixed-effect model. The results of regression analysis are shown in the model (1) in Table 4.

Further, the robustness test was carried out by shrinking the sample data, lagging the core explanatory variable by one period, and introducing the interactive terms of province and year. The results are shown in Table 4: Model (2) through Model (4).

In model (1), we can find that the digital economy and the high-quality development show a positive correlation at the significance level of 1%. The rapid development of the digital economy effectively promotes high-quality economic development. This verifies hypothesis 1. Meanwhile the coefficient of digit² are always negative. The relationship between the digit economy and the high-quality economy is inverted U-shape, which verifies hypothesis 2. In the robustness test, the regression coefficients of the digital economy in models (2), (3) and (4) all positively affect the high-quality economic development at the significance level of 1%, which verifies the robustness of the regression results of the individual fixed-effect model.

The control variables open are all significant at the 5% level, indicating that the international trade and investment have an impact on the high-quality economic development. In contrast, the regression coefficient of govern is -0.0302, indicating that government functions will have inhibitory effect on high-quality economic development. In the process of high-quality economic development, the increase in the proportion of fiscal expenditure will have an obvious crowding out effect. The degree of base installation has a positive effect on high-quality economic development, but the coefficient is not significant.

To avoid the multicollinearity problem, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) expansion factor test [56] was performed for all explanatory variables. Empirically, there is no serious collinearity issue when the maximum VIF value is less than 10. The result is shown in Table 5. It is proved that there is no multicollinearity problem.

Mediation effect analysis

The digit economy and the high-quality development are verified as the inverted U-shaped relationship. When considering expanding consumption, the core factors and paths of influence for high-quality economic development may undergo new changes. We examined the intermediary effect of consumer expansion on the impact of digital economy on high-quality development. By separately analyzing consumer demand and consumption supply as mediating factors, it was found that only the mediation effect of consumer demand is significant. The results are shown in Table 6.

It is shown that the coefficients of the explanatory variables are significant at the 5% level, indicating the existence of the mediating effect of consumption demand. Among the influence paths of the digital economy on the high-quality development, the partial intermediary effect of consumption demand exists, accounting for 16.15% of the total effect. Then, we analyzed the impact of consumption expansion on the high-quality development, considering the digit economy as the mediator. The results are shown in Table 7.

When the digital economy was used as an intermediary variable, there is a complete intermediary effect in the consumption supply to promote high-quality development. And there is a partial intermediary effect in the path of consumer demand influence. Hypothesis 4 is proved. In the model (1) and (4), both consumer demand and consumption supply can improve the quality of economic development. Model (2) and (5) demonstrate that digit economy promotes the consumption expansion. The coefficients of the mediating variables are significant at 1% significance level in model (3) and (6). Model (3) shows that the intermediary effect of the digital economy accounts for 86.63% of the total effect. Most of the promotion effect is realized through the digital economy. But the coefficient of the consumption supply in model (6) is insignificant. It is explained that the consumption supply completely relies on the digit economy to affect the high-quality development.

Threshold effect test and model results

In order to further explore the nonlinear influence of digital economy on China’s high-quality economic development, we introduced consumption expansion to analyze the threshold effect. The bootstrap number was selected as 300. The proportion of outliers removed within the threshold group was 0.05, and the number of grids calculated by the sample network was 300. The threshold effect test was carried out in combination with clustering robust standard error. The threshold effect test results are shown in Table 8, and the threshold estimates and confidence interval results are shown in Table 9.

The results show that when the consumer demand is tested as a threshold variable, the impact of the digital economy on high-quality economic development passes the test of 1% significance level, indicating that there is a double threshold effect. When consumption supply is tested as a threshold variable, the impact of the digital economy on high-quality economic development is also significant at the level of 1%, but there is only a single threshold effect. Hypothesis 3 is validated.

Table 9 shows the thresholds and their confidence intervals. For the high-quality economic development, when the digital economy is considered as the core explanatory variable, the first threshold value of consumer demand is -1.0244, and the second threshold value is -1.0016. The first threshold for consumption supply is -3.6889, and the second threshold is not reported.

After determining the threshold value, panel threshold regression was performed on the sample data, and the results are shown in Table 10. When consumer demand is below the first threshold of -1.0244, the coefficient of the digital economy is 0.3974. When consumer demand is between -1.0244 and -1.0016, the impact coefficient of the digital economy on high-quality economic development increased to 0.7415. This impact coefficient drops to 0.4484 when consumer demand is above the threshold of -1.0016. All coefficients passed the 1% significance level test. This result validates hypotheses 2 and 3.

This shows that when the proportion of total household consumption in GDP is low and consumer demand is insufficient, the increase in consumer demand will significantly improve the digital economy in promoting high-quality economic development. This is because the growing consumer demand is conducive to the basic support for digital industrialization and industrial digitalization in the digital economy to improve the quality of economic growth. In giving full play to the role of the digital economy in high-quality economic development, consumer demand is conducive to releasing the potential of the digital economy and strengthening the enabling role of the digital economy in high-quality economic development. However, it should be noted that when consumer demand increases, the proportion of total household consumption in GDP is high and consumer demand is close to saturation, and further increasing consumer demand will inhibit the role of the digital economy in promoting high-quality economic development.

With the increase in consumer demand, the utility of the digital economy to empower high-quality economic development presents an inverted U-shaped structure. In the benchmark model, we verified the inverted U-shaped structure between the digital economy and the high-quality development. Analyzed from the perspective of consumption expansion, the inverted U-shaped structure may be affected by consumer demand. The validation result of hypothesis 2 is strengthened.

Therefore, when utilizing consumption to stimulate the role of the digital economy in high-quality economic development, we should grasp the principle of moderation. Only by controlling consumption within the suitable range, the ideal effect of promoting high-quality development can be achieved.

When consumption supply is analyzed as a threshold variable, it was found that when the consumption supply is lower than the threshold value of -3.6889, the regression coefficient of the digital economy is 0.3381 and passes the significance test at the significance level of 1%. When the consumption supply exceeds the threshold value of -3.6889, the coefficient of the digital economy increases to 0.6758, which is significant at the level of 1%.

This suggests that the role of the digital economy in promoting high-quality economic development has an increasing marginal utility with the support of consumption supply, and there is a coordinated relationship among the three. The rapid development of the digital economy has provided a good digital industry foundation for consumption supply. With the deepening of the digitalization of the supply industry, this effect on the empowerment of high-quality economic development will strengthen continuously. The consumption supply capacity improves, and the development potential of the digital economy continues to be released, which will bring about sustained growth of high-quality economic development.

Heterogeneity analysis

There is an imbalance in the economic development of different regions in China. In addition, the level of development of the digital economy varies widely across regions. To further explore the regional differential impact of the digital economy on high-quality economic development, and the threshold effect of consumption expansion on high-quality economic development empowered by the digital economy among regions, we divided 31 provinces into three regions according to the classification method of China’s National Bureau of Statistics, and estimated the fixed effect regression respectively. The eastern region includes 11 regions: Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hainan; the central region includes 8 regions: Shanxi, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, and Hunan; the western region includes 12 regions: Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang. At the same time, the threshold effect of consumption expansion in each region was examined, and the results are shown in Table 11.

The results show that the development level of the digital economy in the eastern, central, and western regions has a significant positive effect on high-quality economic development. Among them, the most obvious impact effect is in the central region, followed by the eastern region, and the weakest role of the development level of the digital economy on the high-quality economic development is in the western region, which reflects the existence of the digital divide.

This result differs from the literature [57]. This may be caused by the samples. The literature analyzed based on 30 cities of China. There is randomness in the sample distribution. We included all cities in the sample on a provincial basis, which combine the effects of urban heterogeneity. The economic development level in the eastern region is much higher than other regions, and the level of digital economy development is also relatively high. Therefore, the empowering potential of the digital economy for high-quality economic development has been more effectively released. In contrast, the development of the digital economy in the central region is relatively short, starting later than in the eastern region. At present, the central region is in a period of rapid development of the digital economy, and the development potential of the digital economy is great, which is most effective in enabling the high-quality development of the regional economy. The economy in the western region is relatively backward, and the overall level of digital economy development is limited, but the potential for digitalization is huge. Given the current level of digitalization, although the western region has a significant positive impact on the high-quality development of the economy, the effect is relatively limited.

In addition, when examining the threshold regulating role of consumption expansion, it was found that there are two threshold values for consumer demand in the eastern region. When consumer demand is lower than the first threshold, the impact coefficient of the digital economy on high-quality development is 0.3593. When consumer demand is between the first and second thresholds, the impact coefficient of the digital economy on high-quality development increases to 0.4008, and as consumer demand crosses the second threshold, the impact coefficient increases to 0.6677. There is one threshold value for consumption supply. With the continuous increase of consumption supply, the enabling effect of the digital economy on high-quality development has increased from 0.3795 to 0.6171. The above results indicate that in the eastern region of China, with the continuous improvement of consumer demand and consumption supply, the enabling role of the digital economy in high-quality economic development has been continuously enhanced, and the impact effect has shown a marginal increasing development trend. This is due to the long-term strong and rapid economic development of the eastern region, while the demand structure and industrial supply structure have been continuously optimized and adjusted. In the eastern region, there is still much room for the potential development of the digital economy. Based on the advantages of a large number of resource reserves and policy support, the eastern region will make use of the digital economy to drive the common development of other regions.

In the central region, consumer demand and consumption supply both exist two thresholds. Among them, when consumer demand is lower than the first threshold, the impact coefficient of the digital economy on high-quality development is significant at the 10% level, which is 0.5376. While consumer demand is between the first and second thresholds, the impact coefficient drops to 0.3211. This impact coefficient further drops to 0.1992 when consumer demand is higher than the second threshold, but it is not significant even though the significance level is 0.1. With the continuous improvement of consumption supply and crossing the two thresholds, the impact coefficients of the digital economy on high-quality economic development increase. The above threshold model regression results prove that with the increase of consumer demand in the central region, the enabling effect of the digital economy on high-quality economic development shows a marginal diminishing effect.

This suggests that the expansion of consumer demand in the central region has not effectively stimulated the release of the potential of the digital economy. Instead, it has led to a weakening of the digital economy’s support for high-quality economic development, while consumer demand has increased. The reason may lies in that although the pace of digital economy development in central region has accelerated rapidly in recent years, in the process of developing the digital economy, the contradiction between industrial and supply-demand structures has gradually become prominent. The incongruity of industrial structure and the low matching between supply and demand lead to constraints on the development of industrial digitalization and digital industrialization. The growth of consumer demand stimulated by the digital economy cannot be satisfied quickly and efficiently in the short term, thus it is shown as the marginal reduction in the enabling effect. From the perspective of consumption supply, the increase in consumption supply provides a more sufficient supply of resources for the digital economy, which will make the digital economy continuously strengthen its enabling effect in high-quality economic development, showing obvious marginal incremental effects.

Last but not least, there are two thresholds for consumer demand in the western region. The impact coefficient of the digital economy on high-quality economic development is 0.1663 when consumer demand is at a low level. When consumer demand is between the first and second thresholds, the impact coefficient rises to 0.4060. However, when consumer demand is above the second threshold, the impact coefficient drops to 0.265. All coefficients are significant at the 1% level. It is introduced that in the western region, with the increase of consumer demand, the enabling effect of the digital economy on high-quality development shows an inverted "U" shaped effect of increasing marginally and then decreasing marginally. When the level of consumer demand is low, the consumption potential has not yet been fully released, and the digital economy will promote high-quality economic development and play an obvious enabling role. However, when the level of consumer demand is higher than the second threshold, the enabling role seems to be insufficient. This is mainly due to the relatively limited level of the digital economy in the western region, and its positive effect on high-quality economic development is easy to work in the initial stage of digital economy development. However, the further development of the digital economy is constrained by the limitations of industrial foundation, industrial structure, and resource level. As a result, after the digital economy stimulates the release of consumer demand, it cannot meet the new demand in the short term, and its empowerment capacity for high-quality economic development has declined marginally. There is only one threshold for the threshold effect of consumption supply. With the increase in consumption supply, the impact of the digital economy on high-quality development strengthens.

In general, in the eastern, central, and western regions, the threshold effect of consumption supply is positive for the digital economy and high-quality growth while the threshold effect of consumption demand has significant heterogeneity characteristics.

S1 Dataset

(XLSX)

1. Li K., Kim D. J., Lan K. R., Kauffman R. J., & Naldi M.How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda.Electronic commerce research and applications.2020; 44: 101004. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Zhang W., Zhao S., Wan X., & Yao Y.Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China.PloS one. 2021; 16(9): e0257365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257365 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Abbass K., Qasim M. Z., Song H., Murshed M., Mahmood H., & Younis I.A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29(28): 42539–42559. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Wang J., Wang B., Dong K., & Dong X.How does the digital economy improve high-quality energy development? The case of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022; 184: 121960. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121960. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Yang G., Deng F., Wang Y., & Xiang X.Digital paradox: Platform economy and high-quality economic development—New Evidence from provincial panel data in China.Sustainability. 14(4): 2225. 10.3390/su14042225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Wang J, Zhang G. Can Environmental Regulation Improve High-Quality Economic Development in China? The Mediating Effects of Digital Economy. Sustainability.2022; 14(19): 12143. 10.3390/su141912143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Mardonakulovich B M.Digital Economy In Improving The Quality Of Economic Growth.European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine.2020; 7(7): 740–750. [Google Scholar]

8. Luo H.Research on Digital Economy Empowering China’s High Quality Economic Development.Frontiers in Economics and Management. 2022; 3(6): 362–370. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2020.82058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Bakhriddinovna A N.The Impact of The Digital Economy on Resource Consumption.Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching. 2021; 1(1): 23–27. [Google Scholar]

10. Xue Y., Tang C., Wu H., Liu J., & Hao Y.The emerging driving force of energy consumption in China: does digital economy development matter?Energy Policy.2022; 165: 112997. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112997 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Pan W., Xie T., Wang Z., & Ma L.Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity. Journal of Business Research. 2022; 139: 303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Ivanović-Đukić M, Stevanović T, Rađenović T. Does digitalization affect the contribution of entrepreneurship to economic growth. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business. 2019; 36(2): 653–679. [Google Scholar]

13. Wang F, Wang R, He Z. Exploring the impact of “double cycle” and industrial upgrading on sustainable high-quality economic development: Application of spatial and mediation models.Sustainability. 2022; 14(4): 2432. 10.3390/su14042432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Ding Chenhui, Liu Chao, Zheng Chuiyong, and Li Feng. Digital Economy, Technological Innovation and High-Quality Economic Development: Based on Spatial Effect and Mediation Effect.Sustainability. 2022; 14, no. 1: 216. 10.3390/su14010216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. JIA H, ZHANG W, PAN Y. Scientific and Technological Innovation, Industrial Structure Upgrading, and High-Quality Economic Development.China Economic Transition.2022; 5(3): 388–407. doi: 10.3868/s060-014-022-0018-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Jiao S, Sun Q. Digital Economic Development and Its Impact on Econimic Growth in China: Research Based on the Prespective of Sustainability.Sustainability. 2021; 13(18): 10245. 10.3390/su131810245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Nadkarni S., Prügl R.Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research.Manag Rev Q71, 233–341 (2021). 10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Chen W., Du X., Lan W., Wu W. and Zhao M.How can digital economy development empower high-quality economic development?.Technological and Economic Development of Economy.2023; 1–27. 10.3846/tede.2023.18784. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Minami A L, Ramos C, Bortoluzzo A B. Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange?.Journal of Business Research. 2021; 128: 124–137. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Liu Y., Luan L., Wu W., Zhang Z., & Hsu Y.Can digital financial inclusion promote China’s economic growth?.International Review of Financial Analysis. 2021; 78: 101889. 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101889. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Popescu G H, Ciurlău F C. Making decisions in collaborative consumption: digital trust and reputation systems in the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics. 2019; 7(1): 7–12. doi: 10.22381/JSME7120191 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Tashkulova G K, Kletskova E V. The model of organization of “green” digital production and consumption based on the internet of things and AI.Scientific and technical revolution: Yesterday, today and tomorrow.2020: 329–336. 10.1007/978-3-030-47945-9_37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Pouri M J.Eight impacts of the digital sharing economy on resource consumption.Resources, Conservation, and Recycling.2021; 168: 105434–105434. [Google Scholar]

24. Wu H.Promotion of Exhibition Industry to Tourism Consumption under the Background of Digital Economy.International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture. 2021: 282–287. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.210712.049 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Yu M, Tsai F S, Jin H and Zhang H J. Digital finance and renewable energy consumption: Evidence from China.Financial Innovation. 2022; 8(1): 58. 10.1186/s40854-022-00362-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Jingting F Z.Emotions and consumption of the netizens in China’s digital economy.Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad (RELACES). 2019; 11(30): 89–98. [Google Scholar]

27. Saura J. R., Reyes-Menendez A., Matos N., Correia M. B., & Palos-Sanchez P.Consumer behavior in the digital age. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics. 2020; 8(3): 190–196. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/16624. [Google Scholar]

28. Kartskhiya A. A., Tyrtychnyy S. A., Smirnov M. G., Dolgikh M. G., & Khmelnitskiy L. A.Digital technologies in supply chain management for production and digital economy development. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2020; 9(3): 912–918. [Google Scholar]

29. Gupta S., Modgil S., Gunasekaran A., & Bag S.Dynamic capabilities and institutional theories for Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal. Taylor &Francis. 2020; 21(3): 139–157. 10.1080/16258312.2020.1757369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Xiao L, Xiao L. Generation and Development of the Structural Reform on the Supply Side in the Global Perspective.New Supply Side Economics: The Structural Reform on Supply Side and Sustainable Growth. 2017: 31–62. 10.1007/978-981-10-4639-1_2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Yousaf Z., Radulescu M., Sinisi C. I., Serbanescu L., & Păunescu L. M.Towards sustainable digital innovation of SMEs from the developing countries in the context of the digital economy and frugal environment.Sustainability, 2021, 13(10): 5715. 10.3390/su13105715. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Huang J., Shen Y., Chen J., & Zhou Y.Regional Digital Economy Development and Enterprise Productivity: A Study of the Chinese Yangtze River Delta. Regional Science Policy &Practice. 2022; 14: 118–137. 10.1111/rsp3.12559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Kobilov A. U., Khashimova D. P., Mannanova S. G., & Abdulakhatov M. M. O.Modern content and concept of digital economy. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 2022; 9(2): 375–378. 10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Limna P, Kraiwanit T, Siripipatthanakul S. The growing trend of digital economy: A review article. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research. 2022; 6: 1–11. www.stepacademic.net/ijcsr/article/view/347. [Google Scholar]

35. Wang X.Research on the high-quality development strategy of agricultural enterprises under the background of digital economy. Int. J. Food Sci. Agric.2022; 6: 18. [Google Scholar]

36. Sorescu A, Schreier M. Innovation in the digital economy: A broader view of its scope, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2021; 49(4): 627–631. 10.1007/s11747-021-00793-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Fu L., Liu B., Zhu Z., Cao J., Sun C., & Yu Z.Analysis of the coupling coordinated development and evolutionary trend of digital economy and ecological environment. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022; 10, 1006354. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1006354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Aleksandrov I N, Fedorova M Y. Digital economy and green economy: rural unemployment and territorial self-development in Russia.E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 2019; 110: 02019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911002019. [Google Scholar]

39. Zhang L., Pan A., Feng S., & Qin Y.Digital economy, technological progress, and city export trade.PloS one.2022; 17(6): e0269314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269314 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Goldfarb A, Tucker C. Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 2019; 57(1): 3–43. [Google Scholar]

42. Joseph K J.Transforming Digital Divide into Digital Dividend[J].South-South Cooperation in Information Communication Technologies, 2005: 102–124. 10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Yang G., Wang F., Deng F., & Xiang X.Impact of digital transformation on enterprise carbon intensity: The Moderating Role of Digital Information Resources.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3): 2178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032178 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

44. Doan K., Carrino S., Ivanova N. V., & Evtodieva T. E.Digital economy and intelligent supply chain management: international experience.Current Achievements, Challenges and Digital Chances of Knowledge Based Economy, 2021: 743–751. 10.1007/978-3-030-47458-4_86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Kan D., Lyu L., Huang W., & Yao W.Digital Economy and the Upgrading of the Global Value Chain of China’s Service Industry. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2022; 17(4): 1279–1296. 10.3390/jtaer17040065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Langley P, Leyshon A. Platform capitalism: the intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation.Finance and society. 2017; 3(1): 11–31. 10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Rask K J, Rask N. Economic development and food production–consumption balance: a growing global challenge.Food Policy, 2011, 36(2): 186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Hansen B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of econometrics, 93(2), 345–368. 10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Pan W., Wang J., Lu Z., Liu Y., & Li Y.High-quality development in China: Measurement system, spatial pattern, and improvement paths.Habitat International.2021; 118: 102458. 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Amjad A., Abbass K., Hussain Y., Khan F., & Sadiq S.Effects of the green supply chain management practices on firm performance and sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29(44): 66622–66639. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19954-w [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

51. Barefoot K., Curtis D., Jolliff W., Nicholson J. R., & Omohundro R.Defining and measuring the digital economy.US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, 2018, 15. [Google Scholar]

52. Bakhshi H. (2016), How can we measure the modern digital economy?. Significance, 13: 6–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00909.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

53. Reinsdorf M, Schreyer P. Measuring consumer inflation in a digital economy.Measuring Economic Growth and Productivity. Academic Press.2020: 339–362. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817596-5.00015-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Nicholson J R, Howells TF III, Wasshausen D B. Measuring the US digital economy.Advances in Business Statistics, Methods and Data Collection.2023: 105–124. 10.1002/9781119672333.ch6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

55. Hausman J A.Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1978: 1251–1271. 10.2307/1913827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

56. Schröfelbauer B, Chen D, Landau N R. A single amino acid of APOBEC3G controls its species-specific interaction with virion infectivity factor (Vif).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(11): 3927–3932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307132101 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

57. Zhang W., Zhao S., Wan X., & Yao Y.Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China.PloS one. 2021; 16(9): e0257365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257365 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-22047The Impact of Digital Economy on High-quality Economic Development: Research Based on the Consumption ExpansionPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Li,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 13 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office atgro.solp@enosolp. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jing Cheng

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"This research was funded by the Youth Project of Anhui Natural Science Foundation (No. 1908085QG305), the key project of humanities and social science research in colleges and universities in Anhui Province (No. SK2020A0341)."

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. We note that all Figures in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of all Figures to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

6. Please ensure that you refer to all Figures in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

7. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1:No

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1:No

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1:No

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1:No

Reviewer #2:No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:Comments on Manuscript “The Impact of Digital Economy on High-quality Economic Development: Research Based on the Consumption Expansion” Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to review the manuscript.

Studies have found that the digital economy plays a positive role in promoting high-quality economic development. The contemporary economy pursuits the high-quality sustainable development of innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing. The digital dividends brought by digital economy can well help to promote high-quality economic development. Meanwhile, the digital industrialization and industrial digitalization have spawned new consumer demand and consumption supply modes. It is necessary to analyze the role of consumption expansion in the impact of digital economy on high-quality economic development. Based on Chinese provincial panel data, we first apply the entropy weight method to construct digital economy index and high-quality economic development index. On this basis, it is verified that the development of the digital economy can positively promote the high-quality development of the economy. Then we use the threshold effect model to analyze the role of consumer demand and consumption supply in the digital economy empowering the high-quality development. Regional heterogeneity of this effect is further taken into account. The results dedicate that the digital economy can effectively promote high-quality economic development. This also can be affected by the threshold of consumption expansion, which is manifested in the marginal incremental effect due to the growth of consumption supply. On the contrary, the growth of consumer demand has led to the inverted U-shape of the digital economy to promote high-quality economic development. In the heterogeneity analysis, the threshold effect also varies greatly. The research enriches the theoretical achievements and reveals the impact of consumption expansion on the digital economy affecting the high-quality development, which has certain references for other countries and regions. I have reviewed this paper thoroughly and a few suggestions are given below:

Literature Review:

This section is well-aligned and presents an effective blend of recent and past studies. Overall, this section is appropriate in my opinion. Kindly add some studies in literature review section;

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6

https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031054

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17438-x

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2073

https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-02-2021-0053

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19954-w

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20922-7

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20178-1

https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.967418

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892488

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27473-5

https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2021-0113

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102730

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19628-7

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21929-w

https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061554

Study design:

This section is well-written and well-explained. Referring to my comments in the Introduction section, try to explain each abbreviation at first and then use its short form.

Empirical Results:

Results are explained in detail. Must add much more explanations and interpretations for the results, which are not enough. It is suggested to compare the results of the present research with some similar studies which is done before (more justification is needed).

Future Directions:

Please revise your future research and limitation part into more detail. It would be best if you enhanced your this section.

I hope these comments would enhance the quality of the manuscript to make it an appropriate fit for the Journal readership.

Reviewer #2:Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript

1. In order to establish the significance and value of the study, it is necessary to provide a comprehensive rationale for the research, which emphasizes its relevance and unique contributions to the current scholarly discourse. This will strengthen the study's originality and scholarly impact.

2. English check/editing: I found minor typos/ grammatical, this study was presented with depraved English language usage.

3. The conclusion is sufficiently discussed with some useful policy implications. However, limitations and future directions of research should have a reasonably sized paragraph.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1:Yes:KASHIF ABBASS

Reviewer #2:Yes:Dr. SHABBIR AHMED Department of Economics, Govt. Islamia Graduate College Kasur Pakistan

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool,https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS atgro.solp@serugif. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

21 Sep 2023

Journal Requirements:

1)Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: We have revised the full text with reference to PLOS One's format template requirements.

2)We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

Response: we have ensured the grant information in the system and match them.

3)Please state what role the funders took in the study.

Response: We have stated "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript”.

4)We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Response: We have stated that “The minimal data set underlying this study is placed in the public repository, Open Science Framework and can be accessed at the following link: http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/.”

5)We note that all Figures in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth).

Response: In view of the map copyright issues mentioned by the journal, we have decided to remove the figures from the revised manuscript after careful consideration.

6)Please ensure that you refer to all Figures in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Response: Not applicable.

7)Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

Response: The figures have been removed from the manuscript. This term is not applicable.

Reviewer #1:

(1) Literature Review: This section is well-aligned and presents an effective blend of recent and past studies. Overall, this section is appropriate in my opinion. Kindly add some studies in literature review section.

Response: After reviewing the references given by the reviewer, we selected some literatures relevant to this study and added citations.

Page 2, Line 30-31:

“Many factors including global climate change affect economic development and economic quality [3].

3. Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29(28): 42539-42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6”

Page 10, Line 217-218:

“We construct the index system from the five perspectives of innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing [49-50].

50. Amjad, A., Abbass, K., Hussain, Y., Khan, F., & Sadiq, S. Effects of the green supply chain management practices on firm performance and sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29(44): 66622-66639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19954-w”

(2) Study design: This section is well-written and well-explained. Referring to my comments in the Introduction section, try to explain each abbreviation at first and then use its short form.

Response: We checked the full text and added explanations of each abbreviation at first. They were all highlighted in the marked-up copy of our revised manuscript.

(3) Empirical Results: Results are explained in detail. Must add much more explanations and interpretations for the results, which are not enough. It is suggested to compare the results of the present research with some similar studies which is done before (more justification is needed).

Response: To make the empirical analysis of this research more reliable, we have added hypothesis 4 in the second part “Theoretical Analysis”.

Page 8, Line 157-159:

“Both the development of digital economy and consumption growth will impact on high-quality economic development. This impact path includes both consumer demand and consumption supply.”

Page 9, Line 177-180:

“Consequently, hypotheses 3 and 4 were proposed:

H3: Under the regulation of consumption, there is a threshold effect on the impact of the digital economy on high-quality economic development.

H4: Consumption expansion promotes high-quality economic development through the digital economy.”

Also, we revised the models to verify the hypothesis 2 and 4 in the third section “Methodology”.

Page 9, Line 184-193:

“Firstly, we constructed the benchmark individual fixed-effect model:

〖hqe〗_it=α_0+α_1 〖digit〗_it+〖α_2 〖digit〗_it^2+α〗_3 〖control〗_it+u_i+ε_it (1)

Where 〖hqe〗_it indicates the level of regional high-quality development index of the region i in the period of t. α_0 is the constant. 〖digit〗_it is the digital economy index and 〖digit〗_it^2 is the square of 〖digit〗_it. 〖control〗_it represents the control variables. u_i indicates individual fixed effects and ε_it is the random error.

The mediational effect model of digit economy is defined as follows.

〖hqe〗_it=β_0+β_1 〖cd〗_it+β_2 〖control〗_it+u_i+ε_it (2)

〖digit〗_it=γ_0+γ_1 〖cd〗_it+γ_2 〖control〗_it+u_i+ε_it (3)

〖hqe〗_it=δ_0+δ_1 〖cd〗_it+〖δ_2 〖digit〗_it+δ〗_3 〖control〗_it+u_i+ε_it (4)”

The results are shown in Table 4.(Page 14)

Mediation effects are further discussed and analyzed in Part IV, section 4.2.

Page 16, Line 289-321:

“Mediation effect analysis……

……

It is explained that the consumption supply completely relies on the digit economy to affect the high-quality development.”

In addition, we added discussion to the results of the threshold effect, and analyzed the empirical results of this paper with the existing literature.

Page 21, Line 369-374:

” With the increase in consumer demand, the utility of the digital economy to empower high-quality economic development presents an inverted U-shaped structure. In the benchmark model, we verified the inverted U-shaped structure between the digital economy and the high-quality development. Analyzed from the perspective of consumption expansion, the inverted U-shaped structure may be affected by consumer demand. The validation result of hypothesis 2 is strengthened.”

Page 24, Line 413-424:

” This result differs from the literature [57]. This may be caused by the samples. The literature analyzed based on 30 cities of China……

……

and the development potential of the digital economy is great, which is most effective in enabling the high-quality development of the regional economy.”

(4) Future Directions: Please revise your future research and limitation part into more detail. It would be best if you enhanced your this section.

Response: At the end of the manuscript, we add a paragraph analyzing the limitations and future research directions.

Page 30, Line 561-566:

“Finally, this study still has limitations and future directions. The spatial econometric models are not utilized to analyze the spatial impact of digital economy and consumption expansion on high-quality development. In addition, how to measure consumption expansion more comprehensively is also worth exploring. Consumption expansion is only one aspect of consumption growth, the consumption quality and its impact on digital economy and high-quality development also deserves further study. “

Reviewer #2:

(1) In order to establish the significance and value of the study, it is necessary to provide a comprehensive rationale for the research, which emphasizes its relevance and unique contributions to the current scholarly discourse. This will strengthen the study's originality and scholarly impact.

Response: By combing through the literatures again, the main contributions of this paper are identified in the last paragraph of Part I.

Page 5, Line 91-97:

“From the existing researches, we found that consumption expansion is rarely taken into account in the impact of the digital economy on high-quality development. Will the consumption expansion affect digital economy’s impact on promoting high-quality development? And if it does, what is the relationship between them? What about the impact pattern and effect? These questions are all critical, but the conclusions are yet unclear. Clarifying the role of consumption expansion will help to better achieve high-quality economic development.”

(2) English check/editing: I found minor typos/ grammatical, this study was presented with depraved English language usage.

Response: We have checked on the spelling and grammar of the full text and invited professionals to help and correct the English editing.

(3) The conclusion is sufficiently discussed with some useful policy implications. However, limitations and future directions of research should have a reasonably sized paragraph.

Response: At the end of the manuscript, we add a paragraph analyzing the limitations and future research directions.

Page 30, Line 561-566:

“Finally, this study still has limitations and future directions. The spatial econometric models are not utilized to analyze the spatial impact of digital economy and consumption expansion on high-quality development. In addition, how to measure consumption expansion more comprehensively is also worth exploring. Consumption expansion is only one aspect of consumption growth, the consumption quality and its impact on digital economy and high-quality development also deserves further study. “

3 Oct 2023

The Impact of Digital Economy on High-quality Economic Development: Research Based on the Consumption Expansion

PONE-D-23-22047R1

Dear Dr. Li,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at gro.solp@gnillibrohtua.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact gro.solp@sserpeno.

Kind regards,

Jing Cheng

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1:All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2:All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:I am glad to review to review this paper " The Impact of Digital Economy on High-quality Economic Development: Research Based on the Consumption Expansion " So , I accept this paper for publication

Reviewer #2:(No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1:Yes:KASHIF ABBASS

Reviewer #2:Yes:Dr shabbir ahmed department of economics Government islamia graduate college kasur pakistan

**********

6 Dec 2023

PONE-D-23-22047R1

The impact of digital economy on high-quality economic development: research based on the consumption expansion

Dear Dr. Li:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact gro.solp@sserpeno.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at gro.solp@eracremotsuc.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jing Cheng

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE