Teresa
The Betrayer
Remember that innocent girl who was in a coma for half of Book One? Well, in the beginning of Book Two, we find out that she's the subject labeled "The Betrayer."
Umm. That's not a good sign.
For most of the trials, Teresa pretty much plays the role of temptress. She lures Thomas in, and then crushes him. Then she lures him in again, and she crushes him once more.
Teresa's basically one big mixed message. Want an example? We'll give you Teresa in a nutshell. When Thomas first sees her, she kisses him with tears in her eyes and says: "Get away from me, Tom... all of you need to get... away... from me. Don't argue. Just leave. Run" (20.46).
Wait, what?
First things first: this is all an act. Later on, we find out that Teresa and Group B were given specific instructions on how to give Thomas false hope and trust. Even Teresa's mixed messages are… mixed messages.
Because we know she's "The Betrayer," we always kind of wary of Teresa. We can never trust her, no matter whatshe says. Even when she warns Thomas that things will get super bad and that he's going to feel hurt, we simply can't trust her. Hello, she's The Betrayer, meaning she's going to betray someone. And, hello, that person is probably going to be Thomas. And who knows how many times she's going to betray him?
When she explains her relationship with Thomas back in the Maze, she says: "I did what I had to do back in the Maze, and being all buddy-buddy seemed like my best shot... All we had to do was get you here to pass the Trials. And it's either you or us" (50.34).
Ouch. Teresa crushes Thomas with this revelation: not only did she pretend that she liked him back in the Maze, but she's also been playing him the whole time since. Wow-ee, what's going on here?
Nevertheless, Teresa never actually kills Thomas. In fact, she doesn't truly betray him, either: even though she initially betrays him (you know, by crushing his soul, and his head), it turns out that it really was all just an act. The whole "Betrayer" thing? That was apparently all just an act to make Thomas feel like he was betrayed. When Thomas thinks, "She was either a really good actress or had started going crazy. Gained a split personality or two," (45.13), he's actually sort of right.
But still, we'll have to leave you with a Shmoopy warning: nothing is what it seems in these books. For all Thomas knows, Teresa is still putting on an act so that she can unleash some kind of diabolical final scheme. The Ultimate Betrayal.
The Apologizer
Teresa herself seems conflicted about her role in the trials. She spends most of the end of the book apologizing to Thomas for what she did, and still, we don't know if we should believe her or not. Thomas, too, has trouble forgiving her.
Still, when she snaps out of her role as "The Betrayer," the first thing she shouts is this: "I'm so sorry Tom... I'm so, so, so sorry. They said they'd kill you if we didn't do everything just like they told us. No matter how horrible. I'm sorry, Tom!" (54.15).
It's hard to know what to think about this. If it's true that WICKED is trying to save the world, and if it's true that WICKED would have just killed them all off if Teresa hadn't played her role exactly as she was instructed to, then Teresa's role is way complicated, and we wonder how she could have acted in any other way. But is she telling the truth? How can we ever know?
Anyway, yeah, okay, she's sorry. Teresa does actually get kind of tired of apologizing by the end of the book: there's only so much she can apologize for, especially given the fact taht she did everything she did (allegedly) to save Thomas's life. When talking about her mission to Thomas, for example, she says: "I kind of accepted it, in a way. That saving you was worth losing what we might've had" (56.35).
If we can truly trust Teresa, then we should accept her apology to Thomas. We can see that saving Thomas despite losing what they had as friends was actually very brave of her. Apologies can only get her so far, but still, she feels pretty darn bad about what she had to do, and her feelings seem more or less legit.
We think.
I am an avid enthusiast and expert in literature, particularly in the realm of young adult fiction and dystopian novels. My extensive background in literary analysis allows me to delve into the intricate details of character dynamics, plot twists, and thematic elements within various works. In this context, I'll provide insights into the characters and concepts presented in the article about Teresa, specifically focusing on "The Betrayer" and "The Apologizer" aspects.
Now, let's break down the key concepts used in the article:
-
Teresa as "The Betrayer": The article discusses Teresa's role as "The Betrayer" in Book Two. The term suggests a significant betrayal of trust, and the narrative explores Teresa's complex interactions with the main character, Thomas. Evidence points to Teresa playing a dual role, offering mixed messages and false hope as part of a larger plan orchestrated by WICKED.
-
Teresa's Mixed Messages: Teresa's behavior is characterized by ambiguity and contradiction. The article provides examples of her actions, such as kissing Thomas with tears in her eyes while simultaneously telling him to stay away. The revelation later in the story unveils that these mixed messages were intentional, as Teresa and Group B were following specific instructions to manipulate Thomas and create false hope.
-
Teresa's Betrayal in the Maze: Teresa's confession regarding her actions in the Maze adds a layer of complexity to her character. She admits to pretending to like Thomas and playing the role of a friend to ensure his participation in the Trials. This revelation deeply impacts Thomas, as it challenges the authenticity of their past interactions.
-
Teresa's Apology and Conflicted Role: The article highlights Teresa's conflict and guilt as "The Betrayer." Despite her role in the manipulation, Teresa apologizes to Thomas, expressing regret for her actions. The complexity arises from the uncertainty surrounding WICKED's motives and whether Teresa's actions were necessary for a greater cause.
-
Trust Issues and Ambiguity: The overarching theme revolves around trust issues and the difficulty of determining the authenticity of Teresa's actions. The reader is left questioning whether Teresa's apology is genuine, considering the intricate web of manipulation and the potential life-threatening consequences imposed by WICKED.
-
Saving Thomas and Sacrifice: Teresa's admission that saving Thomas was worth sacrificing their relationship as friends adds a layer of sacrifice to her character. The ethical dilemma she faces in choosing between personal connections and the greater mission of WICKED contributes to the moral complexity of the story.
In conclusion, the article provides a comprehensive exploration of Teresa's character, emphasizing the blurred lines between betrayal, manipulation, and sacrifice in the dystopian world presented in the novel. The analysis underscores the challenges of trust and authenticity in a narrative where characters are entangled in a web of deceit and larger, unknown motives.
