State of Tennessee v. Tammy Tuttle Defendant, Tammy Tuttle, appeals her convictions of possession of not less than 14.175 grams (0.5 ounces) but not more than ten pounds of marijuana with the intent to sell and possession of 0.5 grams or more of cocaine with the intent to sell as well as the forfeiture of $1,098,050 in United States currency. The trial court sentenced Defendant to an effective eight year sentence to serve. On appeal, Defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to sustain her convictions and that the trial court erred in ruling that the $1,098,050 was forfeited to the State. After a thorough review of the record, we hold that the evidence is sufficient for Defendant’s convictions and that we do not have jurisdiction to hear the forfeiture issue because the notice of appeal was untimely. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court but remand for entry of corrected judgments in Counts Three and Four. | Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Lymus Levar Brown III v. State of Tennessee A Haywood County jury convicted the Petitioner, Lymus Brown, of aggravated robbery, and the trial court sentenced him to thirty years in prison. State v. Lymus Brown, No. W2012-02298-CCA-R3-CD, 2013 WL 12181029, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, Nov. 26, 2013), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Apr. 8, 2014). This court affirmed his conviction on appeal. The Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief in which he alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to interview a witness, failing to adequately cross-examine another witness, failing to allow him to testify, and failing to have the jury instructed on facilitation. The post-conviction court denied relief. After review, we affirm the post-conviction court’s judgment. | Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In Re Romeo T. Et Al. This is a termination of parental rights case. Mother/Appellant appeals the termination of her parental rights to two minor children on the grounds of: (1) abandonment by willful failure to visit; Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 36-1-113(g)(1), 36-1-102(1)(A)(i); (2) substantial noncompliance with the requirements of the permanency plan, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(2); and (3) persistence of the conditions that led to the children’s removal from Mother’s home, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3). The trial court also found that termination of Mother’s parental rights is in the children’s best interest. On appeal, Appellee, the Tennessee Department of Children’s Services, concedes that the persistence of conditions ground is not applicable to Appellant because the record does not contain a final adjudicatory order of dependency and neglect. We agree; accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s termination of Appellant’s parental right on that ground. The order is otherwise affirmed. | Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
In Re Briana H., Et Al. Mother appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights. Discerning no error, we affirm. | Hickman | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Hayden L. This is a termination of parental rights case. Mother/Appellant appeals the trial court’s termination of her parental rights to the minor child on the grounds of: (1) abandonment by an incarcerated parent by willful failure to visit, willful failure to support, and wanton disregard, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 36-1-113(g)(1), 36-1-102(1)(A)(iv); (2) severe child abuse, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(4); and (3) incarceration under a sentence of ten years or more imposed when the child was less than eight years old, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(6). Mother also appeals the trial court’s determination that termination of her parental rights is in the child’s best interest. On appeal, Appellee does not defend the ground of abandonment by willful failure to support. Because there is insufficient evidence concerning Mother/Appellant’s employment and earning potential, we reverse the trial court’s termination of Mother/Appellant’s parental rights on the ground of abandonment by willful failure to support. The order is otherwise affirmed. | Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas D. Flatt v. West-Tenn Express Inc., ET AL. Thomas D. Flatt (“Employee”) alleged he injured his neck and shoulder in the course and scope of his employment with West-Tenn Express, Inc. (“Employer”). The trial court found Employee suffered a compensable injury and awarded 44 percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Employer’s appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We reverse the trial court’s judgment. | Madison | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Kelvin Reed v. State of Tennessee The pro se Appellant, Kelvin Reed, appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s summary dismissal of his “Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and Motion to Vacate Illegal Sentence.” Although Reed acknowledges that his petition for coram nobis relief was untimely, he argues that due process concerns require tolling of the one-year statute of limitations. He also contends, with regard to his motion to vacate his illegal sentence, that the trial court’s order was not a final order because it failed to dismiss his motion under Rule 36.1 and failed to make the appropriate legal determinations, thereby divesting this court of jurisdiction to hear this appeal. We affirm the trial court’s summary dismissal of Reed’s petition and motion. | Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eric Battle A Shelby County jury convicted the Defendant, Eric Battle, of one count of attempted first degree premeditated murder, five counts of aggravated assault, one count of employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and one count of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, the Defendant claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it ruled that a witness’s proposed testimony was inadmissible; (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions; and (3) the trial court erred when it declined to instruct the jury on self-defense. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgments, but we remand for entry of corrected judgments. | Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In the general sessions court, the plaintiff filed a civil warrant against the defendant funeral home for “compensation.” The warrant alleged that the funeral home violated the plaintiff’s right to dispose of her mother’s remains and claimed “libel & defamation of character.” The general sessions court dismissed the suit. After the plaintiff appealed, the circuit court dismissed the claim concerning the disposition of human remains for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court dismissed the claim of libel and defamation for failure to state the claim with particularity. We vacate the court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings. | Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Richard E. Mack, et al. v. Comcast Corporation, et al. An altercation between the residents of a home and alleged Comcast employees occurred when the alleged employees attempted to recover an unreturned modem from the residents after their service had been cancelled. The residents brought suit alleging several claims against multiple Comcast entities. Several of the entities were previously dismissed from the case. The trial court granted summary judgment to the remaining Comcast entity-defendants, having concluded that they had established that the alleged tortfeasors were independent contractors of a separate third party entity, and, as a result, the Comcast entities could not be liable. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for such further proceedings as may be necessary and are consistent with this Opinion. | Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
In Re Brian G., Et Al. Father appeals from an order of the juvenile court awarding permanent guardianship following an adjudication of dependency and neglect. Father filed his notice of appeal to this Court twenty-eight days following the trial court’s order. Because Father’s appeal was to circuit court and his notice of appeal was not filed within ten days of the trial court’s order, we dismiss this appeal. | Stewart, Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Amy Elizabeth Luker v. Terry Eugene Luker Amy Elizabeth Luker (“Petitioner”), asserting she was raped, obtained an ex parte order of protection against her husband Terry Eugene Luker (“Respondent”) in the Chancery Court for Williamson County (“the Trial Court”). Respondent asked for time to conduct discovery before the hearing on whether to extend the order of protection. The Trial Court permitted Respondent to subpoena certain records but otherwise ruled he had no right to conduct discovery under the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. After a hearing, the Trial Court ruled in favor of Petitioner and extended the order of protection. Respondent appeals, arguing principally that the Trial Court erred in blocking discovery and in excluding Respondent’s proposed witnesses. We affirm the Trial Court in its decision regarding the witnesses. However, we hold that the Trial Court erred in determining categorically that Respondent had no right to conduct discovery. We vacate and remand for a new hearing. On remand, the parties shall state specifically what discovery if any they want and the Trial Court is to exercise its discretion in deciding what limited discovery to allow and the time frame. The ex parte order of protection shall remain in effect in the interim. We affirm, in part, and vacate, in part, the judgment of the Trial Court. | Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Safronia Rufsholm v. Jerry Rufsholm This is a divorce action in which the wife appeals the trial court’s classification of property and the type and amount of alimony awarded. We affirm. | Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
In Re Ella P. This action involves a termination petition filed by the mother and stepfather against the father of a minor child. Following a bench trial, the court found that the statutory grounds alleged, abandonment for failure to visit and to support, were not supported by clear and convincing evidence. The petitioners appeal the denial of the petition and the assessment of costs accrued below. We affirm. | Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Frederick Jerome Brown, Jr. v. Roxana Isabel Brown In this divorce case, the trial court designated father, Frederick Jerome Brown, Jr., as the primary residential parent of the parties’ only child. Mother, Roxana Isabel Brown, appeals. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it (1) designated father as the primary residential parent and (2) when it established a parenting plan that was not in the best interest of the child. We reverse the trial court’s designation of father as the primary residential parent and remand the case for further proceedings. | Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Shawn R. Bough v. Tennessee Department Of Correction Et Al. Shawn Bough filed a petition for common law writ of certiorari seeking review of his prison disciplinary conviction. The petition named as respondents the Tennessee Department of Correction and various individuals involved in petitioner’s conviction. The trial court dismissed the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to timely comply with the court’s order to submit a partial payment of the filing fee as required by Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-21-807 (2014). Petitioner subsequently filed a “motion to reconsider,” which the trial court denied. This appeal follows. We affirm. | Bledsoe | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Gabriel C. A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her son, who tested positive for illegal drugs at birth. In due course, the child was placed in the custody of the Department of Children’s Services and adjudicated dependent and neglected; Mother was later sentenced to a ten-year prison term. The Department thereafter filed a petition to terminate Mother’s parental rights and, following a trial, Mother’s rights were terminated on the grounds that Mother had been found guilty of severe child abuse of the child’s half-sister in another proceeding and abandonment by incarcerated parent and upon the finding that termination was in the child’s best interest. Mother appeals; upon a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment. | Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Gaines Richardson Defendant, Gaines Richardson, was indicted for two counts of aggravated robbery. After a jury trial, Defendant was convicted as charged. He received a total effective sentence of nine years. On appeal, Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions and that several plain errors were committed by the trial court. After a thorough review, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient and that Defendant is not entitled to plain error relief. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. | Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Houston Thomas Wilkes The Defendant, Houston Thomas Wilkes, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that trial counsel coerced him into entering the guilty plea and that the State withheld potentially exculpatory evidence, such that his plea was not knowing and voluntary. He further argues that these circ*mstances led to manifest injustice, and the trial court therefore abused its discretion in refusing to allow the withdrawal of his guilty plea. After review, we affirm the denial of the motion to withdraw his guilty plea. | Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bruce M. Vann v. State of Tennessee The Petitioner, Bruce Marvin Vann, appeals from the Madison County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The Petitioner contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call “alibi” witnesses during trial. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. | Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Darrin Keith Ward, Jr. The Defendant, Darrin Keith Ward, Jr., appeals the trial court’s revocation of his community corrections sentence, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by relying on stale information and insufficient evidence in deciding to revoke his sentence. After review, we affirm the revocation of the alternative sentence. | Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jereco Tynes v. State of Tennessee The petitioner, Jereco Tynes, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, which petition challenged his 2010 jury convictions of felony murder, aggravated robbery, and attempted aggravated robbery, alleging that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Discerning no error, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. | Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Devin Rogers v. State of Tennessee The petitioner, Devin Rogers, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, which petition challenged his 2013 conviction of aggravated robbery, alleging that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Discerning no error, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. | Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
April Doris Schmidt v. Aaron Errol Ankrom In this appeal, the marital dissolution agreement at issue stated the parties’ intent to enter into a separate farm lease agreement for up to 7 years, upon completion of which the exwife could sell the property subject to the ex-husband’s right of first refusal. However, the parties never entered into the contemplated farm lease. The ex-wife, desiring to sell the property prior to the passing of 7 years, brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration of the rights of the parties under the marital dissolution agreement. The trial court held that the ex-wife would be in breach of the agreement if she sold the property prior to 7 years and awarded attorney’s fees to the ex-husband. The ex-wife appeals. We reverse. | Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Estate of Michael Denver Shell In this probate action, the intestate decedent owned real property at the time of his death that was titled solely in his name. The decedent’s spouse subsequently died within 120 hours of the decedent’s death. The trial court ruled that, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 31-3-120 (2015), the spouse’s heirs possessed no claim to or interest in the real property at issue. The spouse’s heirs have appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. We decline to award attorney’s fees to the decedent’s estate as damages, determining that this appeal is not frivolous. | Anderson | Court of Appeals |
Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Inch to mm conversion: inches to millimeters calculator
Inches to mm Conversion (Inches To Millimeters) - Inch Calculator
Recommended Articles
- Brekie Hill tit*
- In The Heat Of The Night Cast 1990
- The Cincinnati Post from Cincinnati, Ohio
- Craigslist Lufkin Texas
- The Professor Tape 1 Prof Snow Myvidster
- Guardians Win 2024 ALDS Game 1 vs. Tigers as MLB Fans Hail Lane Thomas, Stephen Vogt
- How To Cook Wild Boar Sausage
- Sdn Md 2023-2024
- Tygart Valley Regional Jail TVRJ - Inmate Search - Belington, WV
- Gay Area in Nederland - gay-ontmoetingsplaatsen gecategoriseerd per land
- Quenisha Poole Verdict
- Vonage Support Squad.screenconnect.com
- Principles and Labs for Physical Fitness - PDF Free Download
- Verizon Wireless Expands Broadband in New Jersey
- Florida Lottery $1 million prize won with Gold Rush Limited scratch-off from Circle K
- Illuminating History: The Invention and Evolution of Matchbox - Evolution Of The Progress
- Table Shower And Massage Near Me
- Schedule Pnc Appointment
- Toate Anunturile Olx
- Supply Collections Locations and Supply Distribution Locations (Helene Relief) - NC 211
- Ngc Ventas Santa Fe 🇦🇷
- Jesus Calling August 14
- 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo E for sale - Wenatchee, WA - craigslist
- Matlab Bar Graph Labels
- Elemental Showtimes Near Sedaliamovies
- Craigslist Cars And Trucks Mcallen
- Bf273-11K-Cl
- Tyson Employee Paperless
- Grace Charis Nips
- پیشبینی آبوهوای 10 روزه شیراز, استان فارس - The Weather Channel | weather.com
- Candy Candy - Anime - AniDB
- Wsbtv Traffic Map
- Signs of a Bad Intake Manifold Runner Control
- How to Draw a Caricature: Best Tips for Beginners
- Weed Shop A Proximité
- Krua Thai In Ravenna
- What Time Does Papa John's Open Near Me
- How To Get Rope In Muck
- Best starts in Crusader Kings 3 (CK3)
- FAQ zu Gebrauchtsoftware usedSoft
- M87 & la Chaîne de Markarian
- Momo Hunt Restaurant & Bar Harrisburg
- Blackboard Login Pjc
- Macon Craiglist
- Craighead County Sheriff's Department
- 2024 Toyota Sienna hybrid for sale - Denver, CO - craigslist
- Dr Bizzaro Bubble Tea Menu
- Fatal Accident In Nashville Tn Today
- phoenix cars & trucks "85022" - craigslist
- Altius Dispensary Promo Code
- Deisler Funeral Home Obituaries Saginaw Michigan
- HPE 765464-B21 1TB 7200RPM 2.5in DS SAS-12G SC Midline G9 G10 HDD
- KMS ver. 1.2.369 – Tactical Relay & Super Haste!
- Cassia County, Idaho - Mini-Cassia Criminal Justice Center
- Manale Occupational & Physical Therapy East Los Angeles
- Dopamine Girl Ai Generator
- Clairememory Scam
- Bella Poarch Dazzles in Recent Beach Photos, Hits 1 Million Instagram Likes - Magzica
- All Obituaries | Rose & Hughes Funeral Home | Amsterdam NY funeral home and cremation
- Akai Hana San Diego Coupon
- How to make Chicken Dum Biryani in Oven (Video) » Foodies Terminal
- What is a Geisha? History, Traditions, & More
- L-Lysin: Wirkung auf Psyche und Körper dieser Aminosäure
- Chris Jansing Biography- Career, Awards, Husband, Kids & Net Worth
- Best Places To Eat In Winter Park Fl
- Up movie review & film summary (2009) | Roger Ebert
- Padres turn triple play to clinch playoff spot with 4-2 win over Dodgers
- canvas | Academic Technology
- ✈ Trip from Denver to Nairobi
- Cincinnati Adult Search
- Konkursy Przedmiotowe
- How Much is An Oil Change? And Other FAQs
- 32 Movies That Earned Over $1 Billion That May Surprise You
- Artmusekitsmikash Rtic Divider/Cutting Board For 65 Gallon Rtic Coolers
- The Devil Conspiracy Showtimes Near Showbiz Kingwood
- Help in a hurry: Quick guide to finding essentials in Augusta and Georgia after Helene
- Fuse Box Diagrams Jeep Liberty (KJ; 2002-2007) - Fusesinfo.com
- Xfinity Outage Map Hinesville Ga
- Walmart Pharmacy Curbside Pickup Near Me
- What Does Code 898 Mean On Irs Transcript
- Hotels Near Monsoon Lagoon Ohio
- Kinkyextrovert
- Getlowercarpayment.com
- Legally Blondes - Watch Exclusive Movies online
- Redington University Acceptance Rate
- H. Frank Carey High School
- Autonext Mt Moriah
- Pucker As Ones Lips Nyt Crossword
- Routekaart voor Power View in Excel
- The Ultimate Guide to Expat Living in Panama City, Panama
- For Sale near Bella Vista, AR 72715 - craigslist
- Up to 1.1m Singapore residents will receive higher healthcare subsidies from Oct 1: Ong Ye Kung
- Ride Now Canton Ga
- Haslemetrics
- Saiju Kurup debuts on Sony LIV with 'Jai Mahendran': For us, it’s all the same; acting is acting!
- Baltimore Ravens on how golf helps prepare their minds for football
- Nc Craiglist
- Tinyzonehd
- Security Services | Logixx Security
- Pickwick Electric Power Outage
Article information
Author: Foster Heidenreich CPA
Last Updated:
Views: 6263
Rating: 4.6 / 5 (76 voted)
Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful
Author information
Name: Foster Heidenreich CPA
Birthday: 1995-01-14
Address: 55021 Usha Garden, North Larisa, DE 19209
Phone: +6812240846623
Job: Corporate Healthcare Strategist
Hobby: Singing, Listening to music, Rafting, LARPing, Gardening, Quilting, Rappelling
Introduction: My name is Foster Heidenreich CPA, I am a delightful, quaint, glorious, quaint, faithful, enchanting, fine person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.