To access extended pro and con arguments, sources, and discussion questions about whether the US should return to a gold standard, go to ProCon.org.
Prior to 1971, the United States was on various forms of agold standardwhere the value of the dollar was backed by gold reserves and paper money could be redeemed for gold upon demand. Since 1971, the United States dollar has had afiat currencybacked by the “full faith and credit” of the government and not backed by, valued in, or convertible into gold.
Since its founding in 1776, the United States has had a variety of monetary systems including bimetallic systems where the dollar was backed by bothgoldandsilver(1792-1862), a fiat monetary system (1862-1879), a full gold standard (1879-1933), and a partial gold standard (1933-1971). From 1971 to present the United States has been on a fiat monetary standard.
Although there is no official link between the dollar and gold, on July 31, 2020, the US Treasury reported holding 261.5 million fine troy ounces (about $11.0 billion) in gold between the Federal Reserve and the Mint. The US Mint holds about 2.8 million ounces of its gold as “working stock” to be used in the production of official US gold coins for sale to the public as numismatic collectibles, and for investment purposes.
According to the World Gold Council, as of the end of 2019, an estimated 197,576 tonnes of gold has been mined throughout history, with about two-thirds having been mined since 1950. Almost all of that gold still exists because the metal is virtually indestructible. If all 197,576 tonnes of gold were placed in a cube, the cube would only measure about 71.2 feet (21.7 meters) on each side. 47.0% of that gold is currently jewelry, 21.6% is in private investment, 17.2% is in official holdings, and 14.2% is in other forms.
PRO
- Gold retains a value that has been recognized across the globe throughout history, and a gold standard self-regulates to match the supply of money to the need for it.
- A gold standard would reduce the risk of economic crises and recessions, while increasing income levels and decreasing unemployment rates.
- A gold standard puts limits on government power by restricting the ability to print money at will and increase the national debt.
- Returning to a gold standard would reduce the US trade deficit.
- A gold standard would force the United States to reduce its military and defense spending and could prevent unnecessary wars.
- Many politicians, businessmen, and organizations support the return to a gold standard.
CON
- The availability and value of gold fluctuates and does not provide the price stability necessary for a healthy economy.
- A gold standard would limit the ability of the Federal Reserve to help the economy out of recessions and depressions, and to address unemployment.
- Gold standards create periodic deflations and economic contractions that destabilize the economy.
- A gold standard would increase the environmental and cultural harms created by gold mining.
- Returning to a gold standard could harm national security by restricting the country’s ability to finance national defense.
- Many prominent economists oppose returning to a gold standard.
This article was published on Aug. 12, 2020, at Britannica’s ProCon.org, a nonpartisan issue-information source.
