Refresher Reading
Privacy Settings
Functional cookies, which are necessary for basic site functionality like keeping you logged in, are always enabled.
2024 Curriculum CFA Program Level I Derivatives
Two ways to enjoy this Refresher Reading
Available to members only. Login required.
Access the Full Reading in the Learning EcosystemDownload the full reading (PDF)Introduction
Option contracts are contingent claims in which one of the counterparties determines whether and when a trade will settle. Unlike a forward commitment with a value of zero to both counterparties at inception, an option buyer pays a premium to the seller for the right to transact the underlying in the future at an agreed-upon price. The contingent nature of options affects their price as well as their value over time.
In the first lesson, we explore three features distinct to contingent claims related to an option’s value versus the spot price of the underlying: (1) the exercise, or intrinsic, value; (2) the relationship between an option’s spot price and its exercise price, referred to as “moneyness”; and (3) the time value. We then turn to how the arbitrage and replication concepts introduced earlier for forward commitments differ when applied to contingent claims with an asymmetric payoff profile. Finally, we identify and describe factors that determine the value of an option. These lessons focus on European options, which can be exercised only at expiration.
Learning Outcomes
The member should be able to:
- explain the exercise value, moneyness, and time value of an option;
- contrast the use of arbitrage and replication concepts in pricing forward commitments and contingent claims; and
- identify the factors that determine the value of an option and describe how each factor affects the value of an option.
Summary
- An option’s value includes its exercise value and its time value. The exercise value is the option’s value if it were immediately exercisable, whereas the time value captures the possibility that the passage of time and the variability of the underlying price will increase the profitability of exercise at maturity.
- Option moneyness expresses the relationship between the underlying price and the exercise price. A put–call option is “at the money” when the underlying price equals the exercise price. An option is more likely to be exercised if it is “in the money”—with an underlying price above (for a call) or below (for a put) the exercise price—and is less likely to be exercised if it is “out of the money.”
- Because of their asymmetric payoff profile, options are characterized by no-arbitrage price bounds. The lower bound is a function of the present value of the exercise price and the underlying price, whereas the upper bound is the underlying price for a call and the exercise price for a put.
- As in the case of forward commitments, the replication of option contracts uses a combination of long (for a call) or short (for a put) positions in an underlying asset and borrowing or lending cash.
- The replicating transaction for an option is based on a proportion of the underlying, which is closely associated with the moneyness of the option.
- The underlying price, the exercise price, the time to maturity, the risk-free rate, the volatility of the underlying price, and any income or cost associated with owning the underlying asset are key factors in determining the value of an option.
- Changes in the volatility of the underlying price and the time to expiration usually will have the same directional effect on put and call option values. Changes to the exercise price, the risk-free rate, and any income or cost associated with owning the underlying asset have the opposite effect on call options versus put options.
