One-Time Pad is an encryption method that uses a random key of the same length as the message to encrypt each character or bit individually, whereas One-Time Password is an authentication method that uses a short and temporary key to authenticate a user or encrypt a message.
In this article, we will compare and contrast One-Time Pad and One-Time Password in terms of security, usability, efficiency, and scalability. We will also discuss some of their applications and challenges in real-world scenarios.
tl;dr: One-Time Password vs. Pad
Unlike the key in One-Time Pad, which is used only once and then discarded, the key in One-Time Password is generated by an algorithm or a device and changes every time or after a certain period. One-Time Pad is the only encryption method that is proven to be unbreakable, meaning that there is no way to decrypt the message without knowing the key. In contrast, One-Time Password is breakable, but it offers a high level of security against attacks that try to reuse or intercept the key. Nonetheless, the One-Time Pad also has some practical limitations, such as the difficulty of generating and distributing truly random keys. For practical reasons, it is the One-Time Password that is widely used in applications that require strong authentication, such as online banking and email.
Enhance Your Online Safety With the Rublon Newsletter
Access cutting-edge updates and authoritative insights, all conveniently delivered to your inbox. Click the button below to connect with our circle and gain the strategies to protect your cyber environment.
Subscribe Newsletter
One-Time Pad: The Unbreakable Cipher
One-Time Pad is an encryption method that uses a random key of the same length as the message to encrypt each character or bit individually. The key is used only once and then discarded. One-Time Pad is the only encryption method that is proven to be unbreakable. This means that there is no way to decrypt the message without knowing the key.
One-Time Pad was first described by Frank Miller in 1882 and then reinvented by Gilbert Vernam and Joseph Mauborgne in 1917. It is based on modular addition or XOR operation, which combines the plaintext and the key in a way that produces a random ciphertext. For example, if the plaintext is HELLO and the key is MONEY, the ciphertext is TSYPM.
One-Time Pad Conditions for Perfect Secrecy
One-Time Pad has four conditions for perfect secrecy:
- The key must be at least as long as the plaintext.
- The key must be random and independent of the plaintext.
- The key must never be reused in whole or in part.
- The communicating parties must keep the key completely secret.
If these conditions are met, the One-Time Pad is 100% secure. It does not have any statistical relation with the plaintext, so it does not reveal any information about it. It also does not have any weaknesses that cryptanalysis can exploit. Any ciphertext can be decrypted into any plaintext with equal probability, so there is no way to tell which one is correct.
One-Time Pad has been used for critical diplomatic and military communication, especially during World War II and the Cold War era. Also, spies and secret agents used it to exchange messages. However, the One-Time Pad has some practical limitations, such as the difficulty of generating and distributing truly random keys. It also requires a lot of storage space and synchronization between the sender and the receiver. Moreover, it does not provide any authentication or integrity protection for the messages. These downsides make it not very practical to use nowadays.
One-Time Password: The Practical Solution
One-Time Password is an authentication method that uses a short and temporary key to encrypt a message or authenticate a user. The key is generated by an algorithm and changes every time or after a certain period. One-Time Password is not unbreakable, but it offers a high level of security against attacks that try to reuse or intercept the key.
One-Time Passwords can be based on two different mechanisms: Hash-Based One-Time Password (HOTP) and Time-Based One-Time Password (TOTP). HOTP uses a counter as the moving factor, while TOTP uses time as the moving factor. Both mechanisms use an HMAC function to combine the key and the factor to produce a password.
One-Time Password has several advantages over static passwords:
- It reduces the risk of forgotten passwords and password resets.
- It mitigates replay attacks and brute force attacks.
- It enhances Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) by adding another layer of verification.
- It improves user convenience and experience by simplifying the login process.
One-Time Password is widely used in applications that require strong authentication, such as online banking, email, e-commerce, and social media. It can be delivered to users via various channels, such as SMS and authenticator apps. However, One-Time Password also has some challenges, such as:
- Depends on the availability and reliability of the delivery channel.
- Event-based OTP requires synchronization and coordination between the sender and the receiver.
- Does not provide any encryption or integrity protection for the messages.
- May be vulnerable to phishing or social engineering attacks.
One-Time Password vs. One-Time Pad: What’s the Difference?
Having different purposes, One-Time Pad and One-Time Password have different strengths and weaknesses. Let’s compare them in terms of five criteria: security, usability, efficiency, and scalability.
Difference #1: Security
One-Time Pad is the most secure encryption method, as it provides perfect secrecy and immunity to cryptanalysis. However, it also has strict requirements for key generation, distribution, usage, and storage. If these requirements are not met, the One-Time Pad can be compromised or broken. One-Time Password is not as secure as One-Time Pad, as it can be vulnerable to phishing, social engineering, and brute force attacks. However, it also provides a high level of security against replay attacks and password theft. It also enhances multi-factor authentication by adding another layer of verification.
Difference #2: Usability
One-Time Pad is not very user-friendly, as it requires a lot of manual work and coordination between the sender and the receiver. It also requires a large amount of storage space and synchronization for the keys. In contrast to the One-Time Pad, the One-Time Password is more user-friendly, as it simplifies the login process and reduces the risk of forgotten passwords. It also offers various delivery channels for passwords, such as SMS, email, and authenticator apps like Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, and Rublon Authenticator.
Difference #3: Efficiency
One-Time Pad is not very efficient. It requires a large amount of computational resources and bandwidth to generate and transmit the keys. Further, it has a low throughput rate, as the key length must match the message length. In stark contrast, One-Time Password is more efficient, as it requires less computational resources and bandwidth to generate and transmit the passwords. It also has a higher throughput rate, as the password length is usually shorter than the message length.
Difference #4: Scalability
One-Time Pad is not very scalable, as it requires a large number of keys for each communication session or transaction. It also has a high maintenance cost, as the keys must be securely stored and disposed of after use. On the other hand, One-Time Password is more scalable, as it requires fewer keys for each communication session or transaction. It also has a low maintenance cost, as the keys are automatically generated and expired after use.
One-Time Password vs. One-Time Pad: Comparison Table
| Criteria | One-Time Password | One-Time Pad |
| Main purpose | Authentication | Encryption |
| Key generation | Pseudorandom | Truly random (if done correctly) |
| Key length | Short and variable | Same as the message length |
| Key usage | Multiple times or once per period | Only once |
| Key distribution | Various channels (SMS, email, app, etc.) | Manual or secure channel |
| Encryption method | Hash-based or time-based | Modular addition or XOR |
| Security level | High, but breakable | Highest, unbreakable |
| Practicality | High, user-friendly, and convenient | Low, user-unfriendly, and tedious |
Enable One-Time Password (OTP) MFA and Much More For Free
Start a Free Trial of Rublon MFA today and get 30 days of sophisticated Multi-Factor Authentication that protects your Remote Desktop Services (RDS), VPNs, and cloud apps via One-Time Passwords (OTP), FIDO security keys, Mobile Push, and more.
One-Time Password vs. Pad: Conclusion
In conclusion, One-Time Pad and One-Time Password both aim to improve your security. However, they do it in different ways. While One-Time Password secures user authentication, One-Time Pad ensures secure encryption. One-Time Pad is a secure authentication method, but it also has many practical limitations. One-Time Pad is not very practical in the real world, but it is theoretically unbreakable. Implementing it poses many security challenges, though. All in all, use a One-Time Password for authentication and a One-Time Pad for encryption.
