Forums |Calendars |Albums |Quotes |Language |Blogs | Search| Statistics| User Listing |
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posted 11/7/2007 1:41 PM (#283449) Subject: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 427
Location: Wausau
1. 500 acre 50-60 feet deep clear lake with cisco, walleye, panfish/perch
2. 500 acre 20-25 feet deep stained lake with sucker, walleye, panfish/perch
Without unforseen complications - how long can a musky live?
I'm sure more information is needed to provide an overly accurate answer, but for quick lake research, just wondering the average growth rate and life expectancy.
Posted 11/8/2007 5:07 PM (#283738 - in reply to #283449) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 91
Male Female
6yrs 31 33
7 32 35
8 34 37
9 35 39
10 36 42
11 37 45
He claims there are several records of fish living 18 and 19 yrs the world record being 30 yrs as determined by vertibrae and scales.
Posted 11/8/2007 5:31 PM (#283742 - in reply to #283738) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: Green Bay, WI
I guess unlimited Shad & Perch forage really does make a musky grow big and strong!
TB
Posted 11/8/2007 5:50 PM (#283745 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 1316
Location: Madison, WI
Very impressive that a fish can live up 30 yrs!
Posted 11/8/2007 6:01 PM (#283748 - in reply to #283449) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 299
Location: Nowheresville, MN
1. grow slow-live long-get bigger
2. grow fast-die young.
Posted 11/8/2007 6:03 PM (#283749 - in reply to #283748) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 16632
Location: The desert
Posted 11/8/2007 6:03 PM (#283750 - in reply to #283745) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posted 11/8/2007 9:06 PM (#283777 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 32877
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
An interesting side bar...the Muskies in Cave run, according to the biologist there, live a little more than 10 years. According to him, the fish there are completely dependent on the shad to do well.
I remember hearing that the Wisconsin fish here in the north central portion of the state can live to mid 20's, but I'll check to be sure.
Posted 11/8/2007 9:33 PM (#283780 - in reply to #283777) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 714
Location: Rhinelander, WI
Nail A Pig!
Mike
Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
(Musky length-age.jpg)
Attachments
----------------
Musky length-age.jpg (26KB - 1308 downloads)
Posted 11/8/2007 10:16 PM (#283786 - in reply to #283780) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: The Yahara Chain
Our fish here in southern Wisconsin live for about 17 years but they grow faster than the fish in Northern Wisconsin. The female fish in Monona and Waubesa get to about 45" in ten years. Very few fish ever get to 45" in Wingra.
Posted 11/9/2007 4:37 AM (#283796 - in reply to #283449) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: Green Bay, WI
While one fish does not represent the entire fishery, Mike Bolinski's 50" fish (13yo) seems to exceed the statewide average by about 6". I will have to speak with one of our DNR guys over here, but I wonder if the GB fish are considered more of the "fast growers/short livers" or what? It would have been very nice to have known the age of Ryan Dempsey's 56" fish caught back in April 2005.
I have been told that the first fish were stocked in the system in 1988/89 (as yearlings, I presume), but I know there were some fish in the system before that. In fact Becker's "Fishes of Wisconsin" reports that there were fish throughout the Bay, and down the east shore of Lake Michigan, back as early as 1935. Certainly the numbers of these fish increased dramatically since the stocking started, but nonetheless, Dempsey's fish may not have been a stocked fish. Obviously though, it could have been one of the fish from the first year-class, stocked with that first group in 1989.
Here's an interesting abstract, but I cannot get the article at this time:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/wk1288052t63k000/
Although not a scientific paper, this one is available for free:
http://www.muskellungeclubwi.org/Muskie%20Documents/WisconsinMuskel...
If nothing else, the second one give a nice bibliography as a starting point for future study.
TB
Posted 11/9/2007 7:38 AM (#283804 - in reply to #283449) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
agrimm - 11/7/2007 2:41 PM
What is the average growth rate for a WI musky in these two lakes.
1. 500 acre 50-60 feet deep clear lake with cisco, walleye, panfish/perch
2. 500 acre 20-25 feet deep stained lake with sucker, walleye, panfish/perch
Without unforseen complications - how long can a musky live?
I'm sure more information is needed to provide an overly accurate answer, but for quick lake research, just wondering the average growth rate and life expectancy.
What we've seen here in Michigan is that the lake type doesn't matter as much as the strain of muskellunge. We've stocked numbers of two difference strains here in Michigan, on the linland lakes in the last ten years. One strain outgrows the other significantly, they nearly grow at the speed of a hybrid.
We don't have much data on the GLS because we're not stocking those at this time so GB has all the data. Concerning the GB fishery, that has mixed strains as well. Some of the original eggs came from inland (landlocked) Great Lakes fish and the other eggs came from St Clair. According to the cleithrum project (Casselman/Crossman) the St Clair strain is a faster growing strain.
Edited by Will Schultz 11/9/2007 7:40 AM
Posted 11/9/2007 8:22 AM (#283809 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 32877
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
I'm betting the fish Cowboyhannah got a couple weekends ago was about the same age. I'm having Keith look at some of the survey records there when he goes back to work; that fish also was fin clipped.
Posted 11/9/2007 8:30 AM (#283811 - in reply to #283804) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: Green Bay, WI
If you are willing to speak via phone, please PM me a contact number and the best time to call on my nickel.
Thanks in advance.
Tom Betka
Posted 11/9/2007 8:31 AM (#283812 - in reply to #283804) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 4
Posted 11/9/2007 8:59 AM (#283815 - in reply to #283811) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
tcbetka - 11/9/2007 9:30 AM
Will, great stuff. Could you by chance point me to some literature that elaborates on what you have posted about, and maybe on the performance of those strains? I recently inherited the job of Research Director for the Titletown MI chapter here in Green Bay, so I am quite interested in that data.
If you are willing to speak via phone, please PM me a contact number and the best time to call on my nickel.
Thanks in advance.
Tom Betka
Tom,
Unfortunately all we have is angler diary/reports on one strain but there is extensive growth data on the other inland (non-GLS) strain. With one strain we're seeing 47", 7 year old fish. Illinois has some great data on strain performance with Project Green Gene. No surprise that the more genetically diverse (Heinze 57) the strain being stocked, the better it grows in all water types.
With the GLS the only data is the cleithra work from St Clair. We don't have any good data on our inland GLS but from the limited number of samples they are a slower growing fish. The initial eggs used to create Long were taken from the Indian River in Michigan (two years if I remember right). It is a very low density fishery and the man hours required to take eggs was just too much so the egg take was moved to St Clair.
Edited by Will Schultz 11/9/2007 9:46 AM
Posted 11/9/2007 9:12 AM (#283816 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 427
Location: Wausau
Nice graph, if accurate I'll start my research for lakes stocked in the early 90's. I all ready have a few that cross referenced with cisco lakes.
Thanks...
Posted 11/9/2007 9:34 AM (#283821 - in reply to #283449) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
I have fished some lakes in the last couple falls with good stockings in the 93-96 range and we put fish from 43-46.5 in the boat....my opinion was those were fish from the 93-96 stockings just a guess by how old they would be and how fast I "think" they grow....
thoughts?
Posted 11/9/2007 9:46 AM (#283822 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 13688
Location: minocqua, wi.
Posted 11/9/2007 9:59 AM (#283824 - in reply to #283449) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posted 11/9/2007 10:02 AM (#283825 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 13688
Location: minocqua, wi.
Posted 11/9/2007 12:55 PM (#283855 - in reply to #283821) Subject: RE: Muskie Growth Rate |
Location: Green Bay, WI
bn - 11/9/2007 9:34 AM
knowing what Andy is looking for here might help out the replies...looking at stocking records for northern WI lakes...vilas/iron/oneida etc...in my opinion the fish that were stocked in the lake 80's and early 90's as fingerlings (10-12"ers) are the ones that would be worth hitting now correct? imo a fish at say 17-20 yrs old in northern wi with avg growth rates as most up there have would be in that 48" and up range correct?
I have fished some lakes in the last couple falls with good stockings in the 93-96 range and we put fish from 43-46.5 in the boat....my opinion was those were fish from the 93-96 stockings just a guess by how old they would be and how fast I "think" they grow....
thoughts?
Judging from the graph posted above, a 20 year-old fish should be pushing 50", even with *average* growth rates. It might even be more in some cases, though it's hard to say because of the potential genetic differences in the various strains involved.
I just got off the phone with Rick Lax, and he thought Gelb's fish was 22-23 years old. But he said they posted it on MH this past spring, so I will just go search the archives and try to find it...
TB
Edited by tcbetka 11/9/2007 12:56 PM
Posted 11/9/2007 1:01 PM (#283857 - in reply to #283449) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posted 11/9/2007 7:25 PM (#283896 - in reply to #283857) Subject: Re: Muskie Growth Rate |
Posts: 91