Kansas Comparative Negligence Rule and Personal Injury Compensation (2024)

A personal injury claim arises when you suffer injuries and someone else is at fault. To recover compensation from the at-fault person, the evidence must establish the legal requirements for showing the other person’s fault or negligence. Your own contributory negligence also may be a factor under the Kansas comparative negligence rule.

Proving a Personal Injury Case

Negligence is a legal standard. In effect, it means that the other person failed to exercise the legally required amount of care to avoid causing your injuries. In a personal injury case, the facts and circ*mstances of the accident demonstrate the negligence of the at-fault individual.

Another factor in determining your compensation as the victim in a personal injury case is the extent of your own contributory negligence. If there is evidence that your actions partially caused your own injuries, your conduct may constitute contributory negligence, which may affect the amount of compensation you can recover.

In addition, if you receive injuries in an auto accident, Kansas no-fault insurance laws apply to your case. To be able to bring a personal injury claim, your case must meet specific requirements, as explained in our recent blog post, When Can You File a Lawsuit for a Kansas Auto Accident Injury?

Contributory Negligence and the Kansas Comparative Negligence Rule

Individual states determine how contributory negligence affects personal injury compensation. Some states have a harsh pure contributory negligence rule, under which any contributory negligence at all completely bars a personal injury claim. Kansas is not one of those states.

The State of Kansas has a rule that falls into a category called comparative negligence. Under this standard, the at-fault person’s negligence and the victim’s contributory negligence are weighed relative to each other. A percentage of fault is assigned to the at-fault person and the injured victim. That same percentage is applied in determining the amount of compensation for the victim.

The Kansas rule is a modified comparative negligence rule. The standard is set forth in KS Stat § 60-258a, which reads:

Comparative negligence. (a) Effect of contributory negligence.  The contributory negligence of a party in a civil action does not bar that party or its legal representative from recovering damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, property damage or economic loss, if that party's negligence was less than the causal negligence of the party or parties against whom a claim is made, but the award of damages to that party must be reduced in proportion to the amount of negligence attributed to that party.  If a party claims damages for a decedent's wrongful death, the negligence of the decedent, if any, must be imputed to that party.

In other words, in Kansas, contributory negligence of an injured victim does not prevent recovery of compensation, as long as the victim’s negligence was less than the at-fault person’s negligence. In practical terms, that means the victim’s own negligence can only be at most 49% of the cause of the injuries. If the victim’s contributory negligence is 50% or more, there is no recovery for a personal injury claim.

How Are Fault Percentages Determined in a Personal Injury Case?

If a personal injury case goes to trial, the Kansas statute requires the jury or judge to make specific findings relating to the percentage of negligence of each party, and the total damages for each victim. The statutory section, KS Stat § 60-258b, states:

(b) Special verdicts or findings required.  When the comparative negligence of the parties is an issue, the jury must return special verdicts, or in the absence of a jury, the court must make special findings, determining the percentage of negligence attributable to each party and the total amount of damages sustained by each claimant.  The court must determine the appropriate judgment.

Most personal injury cases do not end up going to trial. Many conclude with a settlement reached by the attorneys for the parties. In that situation, the lawyers discuss apportionment of negligence during the settlement negotiations. The amount of the settlement amount then reflects an agreement about the extent of the victim’s own contributory negligence.

What Should You Do in a Case Involving Possible Contributory Negligence?

In any situation where you receive serious injuries that may be another person’s fault, the first thing you should do after getting all necessary medical attention is talk with an experienced personal injury attorney. That is true regardless of whether you think contributory negligence is an issue.

You also should not talk to the at-fault person’s insurance company or adjuster before you consult an attorney. The insurance company’s only goal is to pay you as little as possible. They will attempt to get you to admit your own contributing fault, to establish contributory negligence.

Making statements to the insurance company can harm your personal injury claim. If the insurance company can establish through your own statements (or other evidence) that you are 50% or more at fault, you will recover nothing.

While it is important that you understand contributory negligence and the Kansas comparative negligence rule if you suffer injuries in an accident, you should rely on your attorney to evaluate those issues and factor them into your case. It is not a good idea to try to reach conclusions about those factors prematurely without the help of an experienced personal injury lawyer.

Talk With Our Salina, Kansas Personal Injury Lawyers

At the Salina, Kansas law firm , we assist clients throughout the state with personal injury matters, including car and truck accidents. Contact us to schedule a consultation to discuss your case with us.

Kansas Comparative Negligence Rule and Personal Injury Compensation (2024)

FAQs

Is Kansas a pure comparative negligence state? ›

Since 1974, Kansas has used a modified comparative negligence system of recovery for various torts (personal injury or accident law).

What is negligence per se in Kansas? ›

Under Kansas law, a claim for negligence per se involves the violation of a law, which can be a statute, a regulation, or even a city ordinance. Id. The violation of the law establishes a breach of a “duty,” or legal obligation owed by the defendant.

What is the statute 60 258a in Kansas? ›

The contributory negligence of a party in a civil action does not bar that party or its legal representative from recovering damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, property damage or economic loss, if that party's negligence was less than the causal negligence of the party or parties against whom a ...

How do you prove comparative negligence? ›

A defendant has the burden of proving comparative negligence. The defendant must show the plaintiff acted below the level of care a reasonable person would have shown and that these actions on the part of the plaintiff were a contributing factor to injuries the plaintiff sustained.

What is the burden of proof for comparative negligence? ›

That means that in order to recover compensation, the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that the defendant's negligence caused the injuries complained of. In contrast, the defendant bears the burden of proof related to comparative negligence, which includes failure to mitigate.

What are the two major categories of comparative negligence? ›

The concept of comparative negligence is an important one to understand when dealing with personal injury cases. Pure and modified comparative negligence are two separate systems used to assign a percentage of responsibility for damages to each party involved in an accident or incident of injury.

What are the 4 elements of negligence per se? ›

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages. This article will describe these elements in more detail.

What is the difference between negligence and negligence per se? ›

In general negligence cases, the standard of care is based on what a reasonable person would do in a similar situation. However, in negligence per se cases, the standard of care is defined by the statute or regulation that was violated.

What is the burden of proof for negligence per se? ›

This means the defendant has the right to submit their own evidence to counter that they were negligent. However, establishing negligence per se shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant who must now prove they were not negligent when they violated the law.

What is the Kora statute in Kansas? ›

The Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) allows for public inspection and copying of some records maintained by public agencies. It is the Kansas version of the federal Freedom of Information Act. Not all records are available for public inspection.

What is the statute 47 645 in Kansas? ›

If any dog shall kill, wound or worry any domestic animal the owners of such dog shall be liable to the owner of such animal for all damages that may be sustained, thereby to be recovered by the parties so injured before any court having competent jurisdiction.

What is the law 21 6304 in Kansas? ›

Kansas law, 21-6304(a)(1) makes it unlawful for a person to possess any firearm if that person has: 1) been convicted of a person felony or a violation of any provision of the uniform controlled substances act under article 57 of chapter 21 of the laws of Kansas or substantially similar crimes of any other jurisdiction ...

What is an example of a comparative negligence case? ›

Driver 1 has $1000 worth of damages and is found to be 47% at fault for the accident. Driver 2 has $700 in damages and is found to be 53% at fault for the accident. Both drivers get to collect compensation for their damages, but only the percentage of the accident that they were not at fault for.

What is the 50 percent rule for comparative negligence? ›

Modified Comparative Negligence:

Under the 50 percent bar rule: the plaintiff may not recover damages if they are found to be 50% or more at fault. Under the 51 percent bar rule: the plaintiff may not recover damages if they are assigned 51% or more of the fault.

What is a comparative negligence settlement? ›

When two or more parties are partially at fault in an accident, California follows the law of “pure comparative negligence.” Basically, this means that regardless of your percentage of fault (as long as it is less than 100 percent), you can still seek compensation for your injuries.

What states are pure comparative negligence? ›

Types of Negligence Law
StateNegligence?Code
AlaskaPure comparativeAlaska Stat. §§ 09.17.060-080
ArizonaPure comparativeA.R.S. § 12-2505
ArkansasModified comparativeA.C.A. § 16-64-122
CaliforniaPure comparativeLi v. Yellow Cab Co., 532 P.2d 1226
47 more rows
Feb 14, 2020

Do most states recognize some form of comparative negligence? ›

Most states recognize some form of comparative negligence.

What is comparative implied indemnity Kansas? ›

2d 401, 985 P. 2d 723, syl. 1 (1999) states: “Comparative implied indemnity is an equitable remedy available to a single defendant among a number of tortfeasors, who by settling with the plaintiff or paying a judgment, pay the other tortfeasors' share of liability.”

What is the statute of limitations for negligence in Kansas? ›

The statute of limitations for negligence claims in Kansas is two years from the date of injury, meaning if someone causes a car wreck that results in an injury to your person, you have 2 years to file a complaint (also known as a petition) in the Kansas courts.

Top Articles
My grandmother lived to 94. She taught me invaluable lessons about life.
Dividend Per Share Calculation Guide
Pollen Count Los Altos
Odawa Hypixel
Fat Hog Prices Today
Quick Pickling 101
Repentance (2 Corinthians 7:10) – West Palm Beach church of Christ
Limp Home Mode Maximum Derate
Umn Pay Calendar
Bhad Bhabie Shares Footage Of Her Child's Father Beating Her Up, Wants Him To 'Get Help'
Cvs Devoted Catalog
Sports Clips Plant City
About Us | TQL Careers
Red Tomatoes Farmers Market Menu
Jvid Rina Sauce
Shannon Dacombe
Houses and Apartments For Rent in Maastricht
60 X 60 Christmas Tablecloths
Craigslist Pinellas County Rentals
Atdhe Net
R. Kelly Net Worth 2024: The King Of R&B's Rise And Fall
Glover Park Community Garden
Jordan Poyer Wiki
Haunted Mansion Showtimes Near Epic Theatres Of West Volusia
4 Times Rihanna Showed Solidarity for Social Movements Around the World
Cor Triatriatum: Background, Pathophysiology, Epidemiology
Encore Atlanta Cheer Competition
manhattan cars & trucks - by owner - craigslist
Joann Fabrics Lexington Sc
Top Songs On Octane 2022
DIY Building Plans for a Picnic Table
Missing 2023 Showtimes Near Mjr Southgate
Boneyard Barbers
Otis Offender Michigan
Mobile Maher Terminal
Forager How-to Get Archaeology Items - Dino Egg, Anchor, Fossil, Frozen Relic, Frozen Squid, Kapala, Lava Eel, and More!
Appleton Post Crescent Today's Obituaries
Yoshidakins
The Legacy 3: The Tree of Might – Walkthrough
Domina Scarlett Ct
Ktbs Payroll Login
My Locker Ausd
Wilson Tattoo Shops
Improving curriculum alignment and achieving learning goals by making the curriculum visible | Semantic Scholar
Lake Kingdom Moon 31
Mudfin Village Wow
Thor Majestic 23A Floor Plan
Amc.santa Anita
Senior Houses For Sale Near Me
Unblocked Games 6X Snow Rider
Freightliner Cascadia Clutch Replacement Cost
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Prof. Nancy Dach

Last Updated:

Views: 5808

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Prof. Nancy Dach

Birthday: 1993-08-23

Address: 569 Waelchi Ports, South Blainebury, LA 11589

Phone: +9958996486049

Job: Sales Manager

Hobby: Web surfing, Scuba diving, Mountaineering, Writing, Sailing, Dance, Blacksmithing

Introduction: My name is Prof. Nancy Dach, I am a lively, joyous, courageous, lovely, tender, charming, open person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.