Updated (06/29/24): California becomes the26 state guarantee their students will take a standalone personal finance course of at least one semester before graduation. Check out NGPF's LIVE U.S. Dashboard for continuous updates on increasing access to financial education and NGPF's Financial Education Bill Tracker for other bills moving through state legislatures this year.
------------
Updated (12/14/23): Pennsylvania became the 25th state on Dec 13th, 2023 to guarantee a standalone half-credit course in financial literacy. Check out NGPF's LIVE U.S. Dashboard for continuous updates on increasing access to financial education and NGPF's Financial Education Bill Tracker for bills introduced in state legislatures this year.
------------
Updated (12/6/23): Wisconsin became the 24th state on Dec 6th, 2023 to guarantee a standalone half-credit course in financial literacy. Check out NGPF's LIVE U.S. Dashboard for continuous updates on increasing access to financial education and NGPF's Financial Education Bill Tracker for bills introduced in state legislatures this year.
------------
Updated (8/1/23): Oregon became the 23rd state on July 31st to guarantee a standalone one-semester course (one half of a new Life Skills 1-year course) in personal finance.
------------
Updated (6/15/23): Louisiana became the 22nd state on June 9th to require a one semester course in personal finance.
------------
Updated (6/7/23): Connecticut became the 21st state on June 7th to require a one semester course in personal finance.
------------
Updated (5/24/23): Minnesota became the 20th state on May 24th to require a one semester course in personal finance.
------------
Updated (5/4/23): Indiana became the 19th stateon May 4th to require a one semester course in personal finance.
------------
Updated (4/1/23): We love adding these updates as it means more students will be benefiting from personal finance courses in the future. West Virginia signed into law HB3113 in March of this year to become the 18th state.
------------
UPDATED (11/16/22): With the addition of Kansas and New Hampshire recently, there are now 17 states that guarantee a one semester personal finance course to all high schoolers. More details here
UPDATED (7/14/22) - there are now 15 statesthat guarantee all their high schoolers will take at least one semester of personal finance before crossing the graduation stage! They are (parens includes date of full implementation, asterisk indicates states where law passed in 2022):
- Alabama (existing)
- *Florida (2027)
- *Georgia (2025)
- Iowa (existing)
- *Michigan (2028)
- Mississippi (existing)
- Missouri (existing)
- Nebraska (2024)
- North Carolina (existing)
- Ohio (2025)
- Rhode Island (2024)
- *South Carolina (TBD)
- Tennessee (existing)
- Utah (existing)
- Virginia (existing)
Find out what's happening in your neighboring districts and throughout your state with the NGPF Got Finance? Search Tool which tracks more than 10,000 high schools
In order to be considered a "guarantee state," that state must guarantee that all students will take a one-semesterPersonal Finance course(at least) that cannot be substituted before they graduate from high school. I'm going to get a little wonky here to highlight why we hold states to such a high standard when it comes to providing financial education.
- All students: an overwhelming majority of people, survey after survey, agree with the philosophy that all students should receive this education. We agree.
- One semester: research finds that "students learn by doing" so a Personal Finance course, rich with hands-on activities and simulations that are relevant to a students' lives, is more likely to stick. This type of course simply takes more time to teach well. In addition, the scope of a Personal Finance course that is relevant to a high schooler is quite comprehensive and should not be short-changed by anything less than a full semester. Finally,research shows that when states attempt to pigeonhole Personal Finance into a few weeks of another course, only 1 in 3 schools teaches ANY Personal Finance AT ALL. Why? Put yourself in a teacher's shoes. Someone hands you a state requirement that says you suddenly have to embed new standards into your class. You can either rush through your existing standards to squeeze in the new ones... or you can (literally) stay the course. Most teachers choose to maintain the same standards as before.
- Personal Finance course that can't be substituted: Given the topic's importance, comprehensiveness, and fast-changing nature, it must be its own course. Students deserve this. Personal finance cannot be covered adequately when it's embedded in another course for a week or two or when another course entirely is used to satisfy a personal finance requirement. A recent examples of a state touting its commitment to financial education only to backpedal later:
- Kentucky changed the language at the final moment from a personal finance "course" to a "program," an incredible loophole because "program" was never defined. The reality on the ground is that it's often a race to the bottom in too many districts where they are taking the stance that a three-hour online module will satisfy this requirement.
Since we often get questions about why researchers often develop reports that cite a different number of states, we thought it was worth digging into the methodology.
So, how to reconcile NGPF's analysis with with the "21 states" cited in the 2020 CEE report?
It's actually quite simple once you dive into the CEE report and analyze the "Status of Personal Finance Education Across the Nation - 2020" (graph shown below). The "21 states that require high school students to take a course in personal finance" (from report) seems to include:
- 6 states where "Standalone High School Course is Required to be Taken"
- 15 states as "Required Coursework Integrated into Another Course"
So, it would appear that 15 of the 21 states counted as having a Personal Finance requirement in the 2020 CEE report actually embed personal finance standards into another course. In reality, this means that a course that has just a week or two (or even less) of personal finance content embedded would be considered a state where a student is required to take a personal finance "course" [quotations are mine]. This begs researchers, journalists, media personalities, advocates, and news-hungry readers who are discussing the prevalence of financial education in U.S. high schools to adhere to a clichéd but important norm: go beyond the headline! In this case, students' futures depend on our collective ability to do so.
Thankfully, there tends to be a continuum at the school level as well as the state level that we have observed: The typical progression, which occurs over several years, sees schools/states moving from a situation where personal finance is embedded in other courses to offering a one-semester elective course to ultimately ensuring that all students take this course before graduating. It's great to see the CEE report highlight a number of states progressing along this continuum.
Why does it matter that reports on access to financial education use differing methodologies?
These reports are read keenly in state capitals across the country. A methodology that recognizes states for "requiring a personal finance course" when they are actually embedding a few personal finance standards into another course can lead to complacency and not push states to go for full-scale guarantees.
As always, we remain committed to #Mission2030: All students by 2030 will take a one-semester Personal Finance course before they graduate from high school.
--------------------------
