Google’s first-gen in-house silicon, Google Tensor, was introduced earlier last year with the Pixel 6 series launch. Now, after almost a year, Google has unveiled the Google Tensor G2 chipset with the Pixel 7 series. The second-gen Google silicon is supposed to bring marginal improvements in CPU performance and significant gains in the GPU department. However, how well does the Google Tensor G2 stack up against the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and Apple’s A16 Bionic? To find the answer, go through our comparison between the Google Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic. We have discussed CPU, GPU, TPU (AI and ML), ISP, 5G modem, benchmark numbers, and more.
Google Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: An In-depth Comparison (2022)
In this comparison between the Google Tensor G2, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and A16 Bionic, we have analyzed the CPU architecture, GPU performance, benchmark numbers, and more.
Table of Contents
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: Specifications
Here, we have mentioned the detailed specs sheet for the Google Tensor G2, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and A16 Bionic chipset. Glance over it to get a rough idea about all three processors.
| Google Tensor | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | A16 Bionic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core CPU | Kryo CPU, Octa-core CPU | Hexa-core CPU, 16 billion transistors |
| CPU Cores | 2x 2.85GHz (Cortex-X1) 2x 2.35GHz (Cortex A78) 4x 1.8GHz (Cortex A55) | 1x 3.2GHz (Cortex-X2) 3x 2.5GHz (Cortex A710) 4x 1.8GHz (Cortex A510) | 2x High-performance cores 4x High-efficiency cores |
| Process Technology | Samsung’s 5nm process | TSMC’s 4nm process | TSMC's 4nm process |
| GPU | Mali G710 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU; Snapdragon Elite Gaming | Apple-designed 5-core GPU |
| Machine Learning and AI | Google Custom TPU | 7th-gen AI Engine; 3rd Gen Sensing Hub; 27TOPS | New 16-core Neural Engine; 17 TOPS |
| ISP | Google Custom ISP | 18-Bit ISP; Snapdragon Sight | Apple-designed New Image Signal Processor |
| Camera Capability | Cinematic Blur 4K 60FPS on all cameras 10-bit HDR support Active Stabilization | 3.2 Gigapixels per second, 240 12MP photos in one second | ProRAW photos at 48MP Photonic Engine Action Mode |
| Video Capability | 4K 60FPS recording Google HDRnet | 8K HDR, 18-bit RAW, Dedicated Bokeh Engine | 4K HDR Dolby Vision @ 60FPS Cinematic 4K@24FPS Action mode |
| Modem | Samsung G5300B modem | Qualcomm X65 5G Modem-RF, Up to 10 Gbps Peak Download | Qualcomm X65 5G Discrete Modem |
| WiFi Support | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3, LE | Bluetooth 5.3 |
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: CPU
Beginning with the CPU, the Google Tensor G2 has not seen any significant changes compared to Google’s first in-house chipset, the OG Google Tensor. The CPU architecture is the same as last year’s SoC, which includes two Cortex-X1 cores, two Cortex-A78 cores (replaced A76), and four Cortex-A55 cores. The only difference with Tensor G2 is that theARM Cortex-X1 core is clocked slightly higher at 2.85GHzinstead of 2.80GHz and the Cortex-A78 core is clocked at 2.35GHz.
Moreover, the new Tensor G2 chip is developed onSamsung’s 5nm process node, which is the same as last year, Google confirmed to Android Authority. Note that Tensor G2 is not developed on the same 4nm process as its counterparts. And we already know that the first Tensor chip was not received well and saw numerous issues, including thermal throttling, heating, and sub-par battery life. So we will have to be skeptical about battery life and heating issues on the Pixel 7 series, which we can only confirm after testing the phone extensively so stay tuned with us.
In tandem, you’re getting almost anidentical CPUon the Google Tensor G2, and the benchmark results (more on this below) also reflect the same trend. You don’t get the newer and improved Cortex-X2, A715, A710, or A510 core, which is quite disappointing.
If you compare Google Tensor G2’s CPU with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and A16 Bionic, well, it doesn’t hold up at all. The SD 8+ Gen 1 packs the new Cortex-X2 core, which isclocked considerably higher at 3.2GHz. Apart from that, there are three A710 and four A510 cores, which are clocked at 2.5GHz and 1.8GHz respectively.
Apple’s A16 Bionic chipset, on the other hand, is altogether on another level. Instead of an octa-core architecture, it goes for ahexa-core clusterwith two high-performance cores (“Everest” clocked at 3.46GHz) and four high-efficiency cores (“Sawtooth” clocked at 2.02GHz). Simply put, in terms of CPU performance, the Tensor G2 SoC is nowhere closer to either Qualcomm or Apple’s offering.
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: GPU
Coming to the GPU, Google has indeed packed anewer and more power-efficient 7-core Mali G710 MP7 GPUon the Google Tensor G2. It’s said to bring a 20% performance improvement over the Mali G78 GPU used in last year’s Tensor chipset. At the same time, it consumes 20% less energy, which is great for thermal efficiency.
Hopefully, with the Tensor G2, we will see less thermal throttling, better heat dissipation, and sustained graphics performance on the new Pixel 7 series. Besides that, the GPU also offers 35% better performance in machine learning compared to the Mali G78 GPU.
Note that the Mali G710 GPU can be configured starting from7 to 16 cores, but Google has packed only 7 cores on the Tensor G2, perhaps to keep thermal efficiency in check. For your information, other phone manufacturers like Xiaomi and Asus have gone with a 10-core Mali-G710 MC10 setup.
Comparing the 7-core Mali G710 GPU on the Google Tensor G2 against Qualcomm and Apple’s offerings, well, Google is again trailing behind. In terms of power efficiency, the Mali G710 GPU is definitelymore power-efficientthan Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Adreno 730 GPU and comes close to A16 Bionic. However, due to the lower cores used on the Tensor G2, it can’t compete with either Qualcomm or Apple’s GPU. To give some perspective, the 10-core Mali G710 GPU scoredaround 160FPSin the GFXBench test, whereas Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 scored 175FPS and A15 Bionic peaked at 180FPS.
At least with the 10-core GPU, Google could have put up a decent fight against SD8+ Gen 1 and A16 Bionic. But it seems like Google is playing safe and does not want any kind of heating issues on the Pixel 7 series. To sum up, the GPU on the Tensor G2 is quite power-efficient and powerful, but due to lower cores, Google loses out to Qualcomm and Apple.
Adreno 730 GPU has not seen major performance improvement on the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 over the 8 Gen 1, except for power efficiency improvements. And the 5-core GPU on A16 Bionic is also the same as A15 Bionic, except for more memory bandwidth. In tandem, if Google chose to go with a higher 16-core GPU, it’s going to beat the GPU on the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and may rival A15 Bionic’s GPU.
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: Geekbench and AnTuTu Benchmark Numbers
Talking about benchmark numbers of Google Tensor G2, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and A16 Bionic, let’s begin with Geekbench single-core and multi-core CPU tests. As you can see here, the CPU on the Google Tensor G2 is marginally better than last year’s Google Tensor (2021). And when compared with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and A16 Bionic, it’s miles behind. In fact, the Google Tensor G2 is close to Snapdragon 888+ in terms of CPU performance.
If we go by the recently leaked AnTuTu score of Google Tensor G2, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and A16 Bionic, Google again disappoints with its latest silicon. The Tensor G2 chipset scores 801,116 in the AnTuTu test and is way behind SD8+ Gen 1 and A16 Bionic.
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: ISP
While the Google Tensor G2 is behind the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and Apple A16 Bionic in CPU performance and is promising in the GPU department, ISP is where Google shines. And that’s because it controls both the hardware and software verticals. Along with all the photo and video capabilities, the custom Google ISP offers cinematic blur for videos, 2x faster Night Sight photography, and 10-bit HDR support. You also get active stabilization using both hardware and software, along with 4K 60FPS shooting across all the cameras.
If we talk about the ISP on the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, well, it’s definitely more powerful and offers an 18-bit triple ISP architecture. It can capture 3.2 gigapixels per second and supports 8K HDR recording as well. The ISP on the A16 Bionic is also quite advanced and can perform 4 trillion operations per photo. It powers the new Photonic engine for generating sharper and rich images and offers Cinematic videos and Action mode to stabilize shaky videos.
Overall, I would say all three ISPs are plenty powerful, but at the end of the day, it depends on the phone manufacturer on how to leverage these hardware capabilities. And it seems like Google is winning this game with new and exciting camera features that are meaningful to the user.
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: AI and ML
In the AI and ML segment, Google is a leader in providing useful features on Pixel phones. And on the Tensor G2 chipset, Google has added a new TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) that can deliver state-of-the-art AI and personal intelligence features to your phone.
In the keynote address, Google said that machine learning runs up to 60% faster on the Tensor G2 chip with 20% more power efficiency. From speech recognition to translating conversations, voice assistance, Pixel Call Assist, Call Screen, Super Res Zoom, etc., you get all the AI-driven features on the Pixel lineup, thanks to its powerful TPU.
Qualcomm’s 7th-gen AI Engine on the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is also powerful, and it can perform 27 trillion operations per second. That said, it depends on your phone manufacturer on how to provide smart and meaningful experiences by utilizing hardware prowess.
On the other hand, Apple’s new 16-core Neural Engine on the A16 Bionic can perform 17 trillion operations per second, which helps in computational photography, voice assistance, pixel-by-pixel analysis, speech recognition, etc. However, no other company comes close to Google in delivering smart and personalized experiences, so the Google Tensor G2 wins this round as well.
Tensor G2 vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs A16 Bionic: Wireless Connectivity
The Google Tensor G2 chip features Samsung’s unannounced G5300B 5G modem, which supports both mmWave and sub-6GHz bands. However, there is very little information about the specifics of the modem and its peak throughput. If we go by the Pixel 7 product listing, it supports almost 22 5G bands, covering most of the NR frequency bands. Apart from that, it supports Bluetooth 5.2 and Wi-Fi 6E.
Moving to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, it includes the in-house X65 5G modem, which offers a peak theoretical download speed of 10Gbps. In addition, the chipset brings support for Bluetooth 5.3 and LE standards. Finally, the A16 Bionic also features a discrete X65 5G modem from Qualcomm and supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3.
Overall, in terms of 5G and wireless connectivity, the Google Tensor G2 lags behind SD 8+ Gen 1 and A16 Bionic. Qualcomm is one of the leaders in the modem industry, and Samsung’s modems have not been able to catch up with the best in the industry. In fact, Samsung has decided that it’s only going to use Qualcomm’s X70 5G modem on the Galaxy S23 series, so you can catch the drift.
What’s Your Verdict on the Google Tensor G2?
So that was our in-depth comparison between the Google Tensor G2, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and A16 Bionic. Except in the CPU and modem department, we believe that the Google Tensor G2 is a middle-of-the-road chipset that features a power-efficient GPU, impressive TPU (AI + ML), and a powerful ISP. Now, it is time to test how well Google has optimized the phone to handle intensive tasks under sustained load and if there are any thermal throttling or heating issues.
Anyway, that is all from us. But what do you think about the Google Tensor G2 chipset? Do let us know in the comment section below. Also, head to ourcomparison between the A16 Bionic and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1to learn more about the performance difference between the two flagship SoCs.
