Formik Vs. React Hook Form: Which is Best (2024)

FAQs

Formik Vs. React Hook Form: Which is Best? ›

"Formik vs. React Hook Form" depends on various factors, including performance requirements, project complexity, and developer preference. React Hook Form stands out for its performance, ease of use, and developer-friendly approach to building it, making it a compelling choice for many React developers.

React Hook Form's uncontrolled components can lead to better performance for large forms, but may require a different approach to managing form state. Formik's controlled components offer more control over form state, but may require additional optimization to avoid unnecessary re-renders.

React Hook Form plays well with third party libraries. It provides out-of-box support for integration with UI component libraries like Material UI, React Bootstrap etc. There is also built-in support for schema validation libraries like Yup, Superstruct etc.

React-Hook-Form Cons:

Limited Built-in Features: React-Hook-Form focuses on being lightweight and performant, which means it might lack some of the built-in features that Formik provides out-of-the-box, requiring additional custom code or third-party integrations.

Hooks provide a simpler and more flexible way to handle state, lifecycle, and side effects in React components. Developers can reuse stateful logic across multiple components using Hooks, eliminating the need for higher-order components or rendering property patterns.

React Hook Form embraces uncontrolled components but is also compatible with controlled components. Most UI libraries are built to support only controlled components, such as MUI and Antd. But with React Hook Form, the re-rendering of controlled components are also optimized.

Hooks are usually used for application logic, yet they cannot be called directly. Instead, they rely solely on property change but without the ability to actually see what was changed. These types of change-tracking hooks can be built, but they only magnify the problems in the long run.

A common pitfall when using React Hooks is the misuse of stale state data. This can occur when we directly reference the state variable in consecutive state updates. Because state updates may be asynchronous, the state variable might not reflect the latest value when it's referenced in successive calls.

React Hooks excels in simpler projects and component-level states, while Redux is better for complex, large-scale applications. Get insights into their core concepts and best practices for combining both approaches.

Which form builder is best for React js? ›

Vue. js offers higher performance speed, and many programmers claim it's faster and easier to use than React. js. Ease of use: Many programmers prefer Vue over React because it makes development simpler.

There are several ways to manage state in React, including: Local state: This is the most basic way to manage the state in React. Each component has its state, and changes to the state trigger a re-render of that component. The local state can be managed using React's setState() method.

The origin of React hooks

Hooks make React so much better because you have simpler code that implements similar functionalities faster and more effectively. You can also implement React state and lifecycle methods without writing classes. Below are code examples to illustrate React class and functional components.

React Hooks excels in simpler projects and component-level states, while Redux is better for complex, large-scale applications. Get insights into their core concepts and best practices for combining both approaches.

hooks are easier to work with and to test (as separated functions from React components*) and make the code look cleaner, easier to read — a related logic can be tightly coupled in a custom hook.