Exhaustive Testing - GeeksforGeeks (2024)

Software testing plays a crucial role in software development and makes the software more reliable, secure, and successful. Software testing is a process to identify bugs for which testers write test cases for test scenarios. In organizations, there is a complete testing team with test labs.

Testers try their best to thoroughly test an application but still some bugs remain in the system which results in faults in the system. To overcome such a problem an application goes through exhaustive testing, where a testing team tries all possible test inputs to test the system, covering all possible test scenarios. Exhaustive testing is a time-consuming testing technique but the result is a robust application with minimum or no defects.

What is Exhaustive Testing?

Exhaustive Testing is one of the software testing techniques, where the testing team tests all possible input combinations for the software. Exhausting testing is about testing everything from top to bottom and covering every possible scenario such that the application does not crash and does not affect its functioning outsiders. Exhaustive Testing helps in making the application more robust and successful and ensures that the application does not fail or crash in the most possible cases.

Complete Exhaustive Testing is not possible because it is not possible to cover all the test scenarios but still testers try to cover as many possible scenarios for software and the faults which remain in the software are very minor and can be ignored as they do not drastically affect the functionality of the application.

Exhaustive Testing is completely different from Effective testing as both have different aspects and work. Exhaustive Testing deals with quality assurance of the application and enhances the success rate of the application.

Example of Exhaustive Testing

To better understand the working of exhaustive testing. Let’s start with an example where an application allows 12 possible input values in 6 different ways.

  • That means the user can enter the password of length 12 with 6 different combinations.
  • For the testing team, there are 6^12 possible input combinations for this particular test scenario.
  • This is very time-consuming to test all these input values.
  • Practically it is not feasible to do all these large input values and has only theoretical significance.

To make things simple and realistic testers can divide scenarios based on technical and business risks. As this helps in knowing and estimating the future risk for the software. As Exhaustive demands lots of time and effort from testers which is practically not possible due to time and other factors related to software design.

Why Complete Exhaustive Testing is not possible?

Exhaustive Testing means testing the application as a whole and covering every possible thing but it is not possible due to various reasons like:

  • Time-consuming: Sometimes there are a large number of input values and manually it is not possible to test the application for all input combinations as it is time-consuming.
  • Complex: It is complex testing due to large input possible combinations to test a scenario and practically it is not possible.
  • Design issues: The internal technical design of the application does not allow it to enter or behave differently in particular situations. Like, a static variable will behave differently in its module and other modules.
  • Time constraint: Time constraint is one of the big reasons that makes exhaustive testing impossible. Sometimes the behavior of the application is affected by the climate, temperature, etc, and this turns in result variation.
  • Different users: It is not possible to test the input combinations as per the type of users.
  • Testing situations: It is not possible to generate all input values of the probable output due to certain testing situations.
  • Manual testing: Manual exhaustive testing is not possible as it takes the tester to his extreme edges to test the application.

Strategies for Exhaustive Testing

  • Recovery: Check the recovery rate of the application by self-analysis and from the developing team. Prioritize the functionalities with high and low recovery rates this helps in knowing which functionality needs exhaustive testing or complete testing.
  • Regression testing: Every time, after fixing the bug tester needs to validate the software by performing regression testing to check the other related functionalities are working as usual.
  • Business Impact: This parameter helps in making the testing process easy and effective. The testing team can contact the business analyst to know the impact of the failure of certain functionalities on the other modules. This will help in calculating the risk assessment of the application on the business.
  • Failure: This parameter helps in knowing which features of the application are most likely to fail. By this, testers can pay more attention to the most failing modules and test them by categorizing them as high-priority modules.
  • Ad hoc testing: This testing helps in finding the defects in all possible modules of the application by breaking the application into small individual modules.
  • Reviews: Take the reviews from your co-workers, business analysts, managers, and all the others related to the application internally or externally. The reviews will help in a deep understanding of the application requirements.
  • Focus testing: Exhaustive testing is focused testing which means the goal of the testing is decided to make testing easy and directive. The testers can focus on the test scenarios and accordingly test an application.
  • Refreshing test cases: Every time testers need to revise the test cases as the same test cases cannot be used every time. The testing team tries to cover all possible input values for which they need to write test cases.

Exhaustive Testing vs Effective Testing

Parameters

Exhaustive Testing

Effective Testing

Definition

Test the software for all possible input values.

It tests the effectiveness of an application and tests particular functions for given resources.

Feasibility

It is practically not possible.

It is possible to test the system.

Time

It is very exhaustive and time-consuming.

It does not take much time for the testing team.

Approach

Mostly it is documented and theoretical approach.

It is a completely practical approach and the tester test the effectiveness of the system.

Cost

It is costly process due to exhaustive nature of checking all testcases.

It is economic and does not extend the budget boundaries of the customer.

Scope

It is complete testing and covers all possible test scenarios.

It prioritizes test scenarios and smart testing techniques.

Challenges in Exhaustive testing

  • Practically not possible: It is not feasible and practicable to complete exhaustive testing. As per the seven software testing principles, “Exhaustive testing is not possible,” but testers try their best to cover as many possible input values to test the system.
  • Manual Testing: Exhaustive testing is not automated, which is the biggest drawback, and testers need to test an application for all test scenarios manually.
  • Time-consuming: It takes lots of time due to the extensive combination of possible input values to check an application. There is no end to exhaustive testing, and practically it is impossible to have complete, thorough testing of an application.
  • Tiring: It tests the limit of the testing team and exhausts the software testers due to all manual test cases and techniques.
  • Large input values: There are several combinations of input values to test the system. The application is tested by assuming how many possible ways to enter the value of a customer. Exhaustive testing is a very long and time-consuming process.

Advantages of Exhaustive Testing

  • Bug-free application: A better software version is free from glitches and performs much better in possible circ*mstances.
  • Robust Application: A more reliable and robust application that can serve in extreme break-down situations. Testing the application with exhaustive testing helps in making an efficient application.
  • Customer satisfaction: Increased customer satisfaction level and a happy customer.
  • Automation testing: Reduces the efforts of doing manual testing.
  • Risk assessment: Categories the application based on priority. The high-priority functions are tested along with their risk assessment.


S

singhsonalmeenu

Exhaustive Testing - GeeksforGeeks (1)

Improve

Next Article

Exploratory Testing

Please Login to comment...

Exhaustive Testing - GeeksforGeeks (2024)

FAQs

Is exhaustive testing always possible? ›

Exhaustive Testing means testing the app as a whole and covering all possible things but it is not possible due to several reasons: Design issues. Time-consuming. Manual testing.

Why is exhaustive software testing not possible? ›

Complete Exhaustive Testing is not possible because it is not possible to cover all the test scenarios but still testers try to cover as many possible scenarios for software and the faults which remain in the software are very minor and can be ignored as they do not drastically affect the functionality of the ...

Will exhaustive testing guarantee that the program is 100% correct? ›

Exhaustive testing always guarantees 100% single-stuck and multiple-stuck fault coverage. This technique requires all possible 2n test patterns to be applied to an n-input combinational CUT, which can take too long for combinational circuits where n is huge.

How can you determine how much testing is enough? ›

Asking the Right Questions
  1. Step 1: Determine what the team means by “enough” Asking a question about “enough testing” might be confusing to some organizations. ...
  2. Step 2: Avoid the “not as much testing as we think” trap. ...
  3. Step 3: Avoid the “kitchen sink” trap. ...
  4. Step 4: Find the right balance.
Jan 14, 2021

Why is exhaustive testing impractical? ›

Exhaustive Testing is a time-consuming and theoretical approach to testing software with every possible input value. Still, it can be expensive and impractical due to the vast number of potential inputs.

What are the alternatives to exhaustive testing? ›

To address the impracticality of exhaustive testing, software testing practices have evolved to embrace risk-based testing. This approach involves identifying and prioritising test cases based on their potential impact on the software's functionality and reliability.

Why developers don t do testing? ›

In most cases, this is due to a lack of time to think deeply about potential problems and sentimentality about the code itself. Testers in task-dedicated roles have no connection to the application under test, and the goals they are charged with are quite different from those of developers.

Is it possible to test a software product thoroughly? ›

Testing aims to detect the defects within a piece of software. But no matter how hard you try, you'll never be 100 percent sure there are no defects. Testing can only reduce the number of unfound issues. Exhaustive testing is impossible.

What is a true statement about exhaustive testing? ›

It is not possible to perform complete testing or exhaustive testing. For most of the systems, it is near impossible because of the following reasons: The domain of possible inputs of a program is too large to be completely used in testing a system. There are both valid inputs and invalid inputs.

Why is 100% testing not possible? ›

Achieving 100% test coverage is not realistically possible due to the infinite number of test cases arising from complex user interactions, diverse environments, and the vast permutations of data input and usage scenarios. Also, The concept of exhaustive testing is more myth than reality.

How much testing is sufficient or is it possible to do exhaustive testing of the software? ›

With large and complex systems it will never be possible to test everything exhaustively; in fact it is impossible to test even moderately complex systems exhaustively.

How much testing is enough answer? ›

Enough testing is the minimal amount of testing that yields a software system that satisfies the stakeholders' expectation perfectly. Too little testing is the amount of testing that yields a software system the falls short of the stakeholders' expectation.

How do you know that testing is enough? ›

Too little testing can result in unsatisfied customers if they receive defective products, but too much (or unnecessary) testing can reduce profit and lead to unsatisfied management. Finding the right balance is achieved through Test Case Coverage Analysis when creating the testing strategies for the product.

Is exhaustive testing a impractical but possible b always possible c impractical and impossible d practically possible? ›

Answer - B) Exhaustive testing is Impractical but possible.

Is it possible to test without requirements? ›

Software can be tested without any formal requirements using a variety of methods, including exploratory testing, ad-hoc and user acceptance testing. These methods can be used to ensure software meets high quality standards, even if there are no clear guidelines.

Is 100% testing possible? ›

The concept of exhaustive testing is more myth than reality. Imagine testing every possible input, every potential user interaction, and every conceivable path through an application. It's not just a Herculean task—it's virtually impossible.

Why is it impossible to test a program completely? ›

It's impossible to test for all conditions:

There is effectively an infinite number and variety of inputs that can go into an application, and testing them all, even if theoretically possible, is never going to be practical.

Top Articles
Tech Know: PC building race
Buying Insurance Direct vs. Through an Agent: Pros and Cons | Clearsurance
Victor Spizzirri Linkedin
Washu Parking
Shoe Game Lit Svg
Star Sessions Imx
His Lost Lycan Luna Chapter 5
Free Atm For Emerald Card Near Me
9192464227
South Park Season 26 Kisscartoon
Triumph Speed Twin 2025 e Speed Twin RS, nelle concessionarie da gennaio 2025 - News - Moto.it
360 Training Alcohol Final Exam Answers
5 Bijwerkingen van zwemmen in een zwembad met te veel chloor - Bereik uw gezondheidsdoelen met praktische hulpmiddelen voor eten en fitness, deskundige bronnen en een betrokken gemeenschap.
Poplar | Genus, Description, Major Species, & Facts
Puretalkusa.com/Amac
Tribune Seymour
Heska Ulite
Declan Mining Co Coupon
South Bend Tribune Online
Brutál jó vegán torta! – Kókusz-málna-csoki trió
Assets | HIVO Support
Ivegore Machete Mutolation
Labor Gigs On Craigslist
Maplestar Kemono
Kitty Piggy Ssbbw
Nutrislice Menus
Craigslist Free Stuff Merced Ca
1773X To
St. Petersburg, FL - Bombay. Meet Malia a Pet for Adoption - AdoptaPet.com
18889183540
Amortization Calculator
Creed 3 Showtimes Near Island 16 Cinema De Lux
Maine Racer Swap And Sell
Lbrands Login Aces
Infinite Campus Asd20
35 Boba Tea & Rolled Ice Cream Of Wesley Chapel
Colin Donnell Lpsg
Maybe Meant To Be Chapter 43
Craigslist Red Wing Mn
Police Academy Butler Tech
Los Garroberros Menu
Claim loopt uit op pr-drama voor Hohenzollern
Bernie Platt, former Cherry Hill mayor and funeral home magnate, has died at 90
Pepsi Collaboration
Trizzle Aarp
Busted Newspaper Campbell County KY Arrests
Skyward Marshfield
Pa Legion Baseball
Missed Connections Dayton Ohio
Craigslist Pets Lewiston Idaho
BYU Football: Instant Observations From Blowout Win At Wyoming
Ippa 番号
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Moshe Kshlerin

Last Updated:

Views: 5571

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Moshe Kshlerin

Birthday: 1994-01-25

Address: Suite 609 315 Lupita Unions, Ronnieburgh, MI 62697

Phone: +2424755286529

Job: District Education Designer

Hobby: Yoga, Gunsmithing, Singing, 3D printing, Nordic skating, Soapmaking, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Moshe Kshlerin, I am a gleaming, attractive, outstanding, pleasant, delightful, outstanding, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.