Can You Safely Spend More Early in Retirement? (2024)

Over the Top

Friday’s column discussed a radio personality’s recommendation that retirees spend 8% each year from their investment portfolios. Those withdrawals would be inflation-adjusted, as with Social Security payments. To accomplish that mission, he stated, investors should place 100% of their assets in equities.

The suggestion should be regarded as performance art rather than actual advice. Even if the speaker’s counsel had been supported by solid research—which it assuredly was not—few retirees would adopt that plan. It doesn’t take a Nobel Prize to realize that the bankrupt 75-year-olds do not make financial comebacks.

History’s Verdict

His comments, however, lead to an interesting question. If previous retirees had attempted such a strategy, how would they have fared? Such was Friday’s topic. I will not repeat the full details, as they can be found here, but the short version is that I evaluated 68 rolling 30-year periods, determining the fate of equity portfolios that used 8% real withdrawal rates.

In 45% of the trials, the portfolio did not withstand the scheduled disbursem*nts. Once in every three attempts, it was exhausted by year 20. One could, I suppose, paint the pig by pointing out that 8% withdrawals succeeded more often than not. The same, regrettably, may be said for a round of Russian roulette.

This strategy is ill-suited for most newly minted retirees, as their time horizons are too long. For example, a 65-year-old nonsmoking male with average health has a 25% chance of surviving 27 years. (For women of the same age, the figure is 29 years.) Spending aggressively can make sense for older retirees who have relatively short life expectancies, but it is not appropriate for those in their 60s.

Don’t Start Slowly!

Perhaps, though, one could apply the strategy flexibly. That is, rather than automatically withdrawing the same inflation-adjusted amount—assuming a 3% inflation rate, withdraw $40,000 from a $500,000 portfolio in year 1, $41,200 in year 2, $42,436 in year 3, and so forth—adjust spending according to the stock market’s results. If equities perform well, stay on track. If they do not, pull back.

Supporting that logic is a calculation from the previous column. In that article, I computed the median stock market return during the initial year of retirement for 1) the portfolios that survived until year 20 and 2) those that did not. The results were, respectively, 11.1% and 0—a very large difference! Indirectly, those results suggest that retiree portfolios fare best when they start strongly.

That is indeed the case. For reasons I have discussed elsewhere, returns that occur early during retirement are much more important than the later arrivals. The chart below demonstrates that precept. It shows the portfolio failure rates, over 30 years, for all trials of the 8% withdrawal rate during which the first year’s return was negative, after considering the effect of inflation. It repeats the exercise for the cumulative results over the initial two-, three-, four-, and five-year periods.

Failure Percentages With an 8% Real Withdrawal Rate

(100% Equity Portfolio, 30-Year Holding Period)

Can You Safely Spend More Early in Retirement? (1)

The picture tells a grim story. Withdrawing an inflation-adjusted 8% from an equity portfolio is perilous at the best of times, but outright destructive for portfolios that start poorly. Such strategies misfire two thirds of the time if the first year’s return is negative (again, after accounting for inflation). It only gets worse from there. By year 5, there’s no hope. No portfolio that suffered real losses through its initial five years survived the full three decades.

Withdrawal-Rate Cuts

What about starting aggressively with a high spending rate, then backtracking if necessary? For this article, I evaluated a simple, if unsophisticated, investment policy. Begin with an 8% withdrawal rate, per the radio host’s recommendation. If the portfolio’s real returns are negative after any of the first five years, switch to an annual withdrawal rate of 4%. Once at 4%, stay there.

I designed this arrangement to instruct, not advise. Halving one’s portfolio-withdrawal rate forever, based on an arbitrary performance rule, would be silly. But the exercise should provide at least some indication of the power of on-the-fly spending adjustments. Are such changes effective? Do they meaningfully affect portfolio survival rates? Or do they come too little, too late?

The next chart answers those questions. As the long title and subhead suggest, it is a bit tricky to explain, so bear with me. The left bar shows the failure rate, over 30 years, for portfolios that used a steady 4% withdrawal rate. (To reiterate, these are the historical figures. When looking forward, Morningstar calculates different future odds.) It represents the conventional case. The remaining bars show the failure rates for portfolios that start with 8% withdrawal rates, then retreat to 4% after they suffer negative real returns.

Failure Percentages With an 8% Real Withdrawal Rate and Adjusting for Slow Starts

(100% Equity Portfolio, Initial 8% Real Withdrawal Rate, Adjusted Rate of 4%, 30-Year Holding Period)

Can You Safely Spend More Early in Retirement? (2)

Incorporating the adjustment fixes the year 1 problem. Retirees who spend ambitiously during their initial 12 months but then back down if that portfolio loses money in real terms are barely worse off than those who used a 4% withdrawal rate from the beginning. But the news sharply worsens if the two-year results are negative. And from year 3 onward, it is unpalatably bad.

Wrapping Up

The conclusions are inescapable.

1) An 8% real withdrawal rate from an equity portfolio can persist through several decades. Retirees who are fortunate enough to ride an early bull market will likely be able to maintain such a high spending rate.

2) But how to know in advance? Bull markets appear only in hindsight.

3) Although it’s possible to withdraw flexibly, by scampering to safety if stocks perform poorly, there’s little room for error. In nearly one observation in five, a mere two years’ worth of investment results doomed one portfolio in five, even after the real withdrawal rate was slashed to 4%.

Beginning one’s retirement with a 5% withdrawal rate and the willingness to adjust is reasonable. Perhaps even 6%. After that, not so much. My suggestion: Don’t try that at home.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article.Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

The opinions expressed here are the author’s. Morningstar values diversity of thought and publishes a broad range of viewpoints.

Can You Safely Spend More Early in Retirement? (2024)
Top Articles
Research Guides: Battle Studies, Country Studies, & Staff Rides: Barbary Wars & the Battle of Tripoli
Priority Mail International - Rates & Features | USPS
Was ist ein Crawler? | Finde es jetzt raus! | OMT-Lexikon
Winston Salem Nc Craigslist
Phenix Food Locker Weekly Ad
Category: Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes | EA Forums
Rls Elizabeth Nj
The Wicked Lady | Rotten Tomatoes
Bernie Platt, former Cherry Hill mayor and funeral home magnate, has died at 90
Huge Boobs Images
24 Hour Walmart Detroit Mi
Craigslist Farm And Garden Cincinnati Ohio
7 Fly Traps For Effective Pest Control
Hilo Hi Craigslist
Wisconsin Women's Volleyball Team Leaked Pictures
History of Osceola County
Uktulut Pier Ritual Site
Geometry Review Quiz 5 Answer Key
Pickswise Review 2024: Is Pickswise a Trusted Tipster?
Selfservice Bright Lending
Violent Night Showtimes Near Century 14 Vallejo
Craigslist Houses For Rent In Milan Tennessee
A Cup of Cozy – Podcast
Ihub Fnma Message Board
Margaret Shelton Jeopardy Age
Cowboy Pozisyon
Guinness World Record For Longest Imessage
Busch Gardens Wait Times
Stouffville Tribune (Stouffville, ON), March 27, 1947, p. 1
Craigslist Texas Killeen
Egg Crutch Glove Envelope
Justin Mckenzie Phillip Bryant
How to Watch the X Trilogy Starring Mia Goth in Chronological Order
Clark County Ky Busted Newspaper
ATM Near Me | Find The Nearest ATM Location | ATM Locator NL
450 Miles Away From Me
Planet Fitness Santa Clarita Photos
Ticket To Paradise Showtimes Near Marshall 6 Theatre
Craigslist Pets Plattsburgh Ny
How to Get a Better Signal on Your iPhone or Android Smartphone
Carroll White Remc Outage Map
Mcalister's Deli Warrington Reviews
Arnesons Webcam
Haunted Mansion Showtimes Near Millstone 14
Lesson 5 Homework 4.5 Answer Key
Erespassrider Ual
300+ Unique Hair Salon Names 2024
Rovert Wrestling
Twizzlers Strawberry - 6 x 70 gram | bol
Otter Bustr
Grace Charis Shagmag
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ms. Lucile Johns

Last Updated:

Views: 6400

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ms. Lucile Johns

Birthday: 1999-11-16

Address: Suite 237 56046 Walsh Coves, West Enid, VT 46557

Phone: +59115435987187

Job: Education Supervisor

Hobby: Genealogy, Stone skipping, Skydiving, Nordic skating, Couponing, Coloring, Gardening

Introduction: My name is Ms. Lucile Johns, I am a successful, friendly, friendly, homely, adventurous, handsome, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.