Theoretical (Ultimate) and allowable bearing capacity can be assessed for the following:
- Shallow Foundations
- strip footings
- square footings
- circular footings
- Deep foundations
- end bearing
- skin friction
For comprehensive examples of bearing capacity problems see:
- Bearing Capacity Examples
Allowable Bearing Capacity
Qa = Qu Qa = Allowable bearing capacity (kN/m2) or (lb/ft2)
F.S.Where:
Qu = ultimate bearing capacity (kN/m2)or (lb/ft2) *See below for theory
F.S. = Factor of Safety *See information on factor of safetyUltimate Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations
Terzaghi Ultimate Bearing Capacity Theory
Qu = c Nc + g D Nq + 0.5 g B Ng
= Ultimate bearing capacity equation for shallow strip footings, (kN/m2)(lb/ft2)Qu = 1.3 c Nc + g D Nq + 0.4 g B Ng
= Ultimate bearing capacity equation for shallow square footings, (kN/m2)(lb/ft2)Qu = 1.3 c Nc + g D Nq + 0.3 g B Ng
= Ultimate bearing capacity equation for shallow circular footings, (kN/m2)(lb/ft2)Where:
c = Cohesion of soil (kN/m2) (lb/ft2),
g = effective unit weight of soil (kN/m3) (lb/ft3), *see note below
D = depth of footing (m) (ft),
B = width of footing (m) (ft),
Nc=cotf(Nq 1),*see typical bearing capacity factors
Nq=e2(3p/4-f/2)tanf / [2 cos2(45+f/2)], *see typical bearing capacity factors
Ng=(1/2) tanf(kp /cos2 f - 1), *see typical bearing capacity factors
e = Napier's constant = 2.718...,
kp = passive pressure coefficient, and
f = angle of internal friction (degrees).Notes:
Effective unit weight, g, is the unit weight of the soil for soils above the water table and capillary rise. For saturated soils, the effective unit weight is the unit weight of water, gw, 9.81 kN/m3 (62.4 lb/ft3), subtracted from the saturated unit weight of soil.Find more information in the foundations section.Meyerhof Bearing Capacity Theory Based on Standard Penetration Test Values
Qu = 31.417(NB + ND) (kN/m2) (metric)
Qu = NB + ND (tons/ft2) (standard)
10 10For footing widths of 1.2 meters (4 feet) or less
Qa = 11,970N (kN/m2) (metric)
Qa = 1.25N (tons/ft2) (standard)
10For footing widths of 3 meters (10 feet) or more
Qa = 9,576N (kN/m2) (metric)
Qa = N (tons/ft2) (standard)
10Where:
N= N value derived from Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
D = depth of footing (m) (ft), and
B = width of footing (m) (ft).Note: All Meyerhof equations are for foundations bearing on clean sands. The first equation is for ultimate bearing capacity, while the second two are factored within the equation in order to provide an allowable bearing capacity. Linear interpolation can be performed for footing widths between 1.2 meters (4 feet) and 3 meters (10 feet). Meyerhof equations are based on limiting total settlement to 25 cm (1 inch), and differential settlement to 19 cm (3/4 inch).
Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Deep Foundations (Pile)
Qult = Qp + Qf
Where:
Qult = Ultimate bearing capacity of pile, kN (lb)
Qp = Theoretical bearing capacity for tip of foundation, or end bearing, kN (lb)
Qf = Theoretical bearing capacity due to shaft friction, or adhesion betweenfoundation shaft and soil, kN (lb)End Bearing (Tip) Capacity of Pile Foundation
Qp = Apqp
Where:
Qp = Theoretical bearing capacity for tip of foundation, or end bearing, kN (lb)
Ap = Effective area of the tip of the pile, m2 (ft2)
For a circular closed end pile or circular plugged pile; Ap = p(B/2)2m2 (ft2)
qp = gDNq
= Theoretical unit tip-bearing capacity for cohesionless and silt soils, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
qp = 9c
= Theoretical unit tip-bearing capacity for cohesive soils, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
g = effective unit weight of soil, kN/m3 (lb/ft3), *See notes below
D = Effective depth of pile, m (ft), where D < Dc,
Nq = Bearing capacity factor for piles,
c = cohesion of soil, kN/m2 (lb/ft2),
B = diameter of pile, m (ft), and
Dc = critical depth for piles in loose silts or sands m (ft).
Dc= 10B, for loose silts and sands
Dc= 15B, for medium dense silts and sands
Dc= 20B, for dense silts and sandsSkin (Shaft) Friction Capacity of Pile Foundation
Qf = Afqf for one hom*ogeneous layer of soil
Qf = pSqfL for multi-layers of soil
Where:
Qf = Theoretical bearing capacity due to shaft friction, or adhesion betweenfoundation shaft and soil, kN (lb)
Af = pL; Effective surface area of the pile shaft, m2 (ft2)
qf = ks tan d= Theoretical unit friction capacity for cohesionless soils, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
qf = cA + ks tan d= Theoretical unit friction capacity for silts, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
qf = aSu = Theoretical unit friction capacity for cohesive soils, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
p = perimeter of pile cross-section, m (ft)
for a circular pile; p = 2p(B/2)
for a square pile; p = 4B
L = Effective length of pile, m (ft) *See Notes below
a = 1 - 0.1(Suc)2 = adhesion factor, kN/m2 (ksf), where Suc < 48 kN/m2 (1 ksf)
a = 1 [0.9 + 0.3(Suc - 1)] kN/m2, (ksf) where Suc > 48 kN/m2, (1 ksf)
Suc
Suc = 2c = Unconfined compressive strength , kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
cA = adhesion
= c for rough concrete, rusty steel, corrugated metal
0.8c < cA < c for smooth concrete
0.5c < cA < 0.9c for clean steel
c = cohesion of soil, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
d = external friction angleof soil and wall contact (deg)
f= angle of internalfriction (deg)
s = gD = effective overburden pressure, kN/m2, (lb/ft2)
k = lateral earth pressure coefficientfor piles
g = effective unit weight of soil, kN/m3 (lb/ft3) *See notes below
B = diameter or width of pile, m (ft)
D = Effective depth of pile, m (ft), where D < Dc
Dc = critical depth for piles in loose silts or sands m (ft).
Dc= 10B, for loose silts and sands
Dc= 15B, for medium dense silts and sands
Dc= 20B, for dense silts and sands
S = summation of differing soil layers (i.e. a1 + a2 + .... + an)Notes: Determining effective length requires engineering judgment. The effective length can be the pile depth minus any disturbed surface soils, soft/ loose soils, or seasonal variation. The effective length may also be the length of a pile segment within a single soil layer of a multi layered soil. Effective unit weight, g, is the unit weight of the soil for soils above the water table and capillary rise. For saturated soils, the effective unit weight is the unit weight of water, gw, 9.81 kN/m3 (62.4 lb/ft3), subtracted from the saturated unit weight of soil.
************
Meyerhof Method for Determining qp and qf in Sand
Theoretical unit tip-bearing capacity for driven piles in sand, when D > 10:
B
qp = 4Nc tons/ft2standardTheoretical unit tip-bearing capacity for drilled piles in sand:
qp = 1.2Nc tons/ft2standardTheoretical unit friction-bearing capacity for driven piles in sand:
qf = Ntons/ft2 standard
50Theoretical unit friction-bearing capacity for drilled piles in sand:
qf = Ntons/ft2 standard
100Where:
D = pile embedment depth, ft
B = pile diameter, ft
Nc = Cn(N)
Cn = 0.77 log 20
s
N = N-Value from SPT test
s = gD = effective overburden stress at pile embedment depth, tons/ft2
= (g - gw)D = effective stress if below water table, tons/ft2
g = effective unit weight of soil, tons/ft3
gw = 0.0312 tons/ft3 = unit weight of water
Examples for determining allowable bearing capacity
Example #1: Determine allowable bearing capacity and width for a shallow strip footing on cohesionless silty sand and gravel soil. Loose soils were encountered in the upper 0.6 m (2 feet) of building subgrade. Footing must withstand a 144 kN/m2 (3000 lb/ft2) building pressure.
Given
bearing pressure from building = 144 kN/m2 (3000 lbs/ft2)
unit weight of soil, g = 21 kN/m3 (132 lbs/ft3)*from soil testing, see typical g values
Cohesion, c = 0*from soil testing, see typical c values
angle of Internal Friction, f = 32 degrees*from soil testing, see typicalf values
footing depth, D = 0.6 m (2 ft) *because loose soils in upper soil strata
Solution
Try a minimal footing width, B = 0.3 m (B = 1 foot).
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Three is typical for this type of application. Seefactor of safety for more information.
Determine bearing capacity factors Ng, Nc and Nq. See typical bearing capacity factors relating to the soils' angle of internal friction.
- Ng = 22
- Nc = 35.5
- Nq = 23.2
Solve for ultimate bearing capacity,
Qu = c Nc + g D Nq + 0.5 g B Ng *strip footing eq.
Qu = 0(35.5) + 21 kN/m3(0.6m)(23.2) + 0.5(21 kN/m3)(0.3 m)(22)metric
Qu = 362 kN/m2
Qu = 0(35.5) + 132lbs/ft3(2ft)(23.2) + 0.5(132lbs/ft3)(1ft)(22)standard
Qu = 7577 lbs/ft2
Solve for allowable bearing capacity,
Qa = Qu
F.S.
Qa = 362 kN/m2 = 121 kN/m2 not o.k. metric
3
Qa = 7577lbs/ft2 = 2526 lbs/ft2 not o.k. standard
3
Since Qa < required 144 kN/m2 (3000 lbs/ft2) bearing pressure, increase footing width, B orfoundation depth, D to increase bearing capacity.
Try footing width, B = 0.61 m (B = 2 ft).
Qu = 0 + 21 kN/m3(0.61 m)(23.2) + 0.5(21 kN/m3)(0.61 m)(22)metric
Qu = 438 kN/m2
Qu = 0 + 132 lbs/ft3(2 ft)(23.2) + 0.5(132 lbs/ft3)(2 ft)(22)standard
Qu = 9029 lbs/ft2
Qa = 438 kN/m2 = 146 kN/m2Qa > 144 kN/m2 o.k. metric
3
Qa = 9029 lbs/ft2 = 3010 lbs/ft2Qa > 3000 lbs/ft2 o.k. standard
3
Conclusion
Footing shall be 0.61 meters (2 feet) wide at a depth of 0.61 meters (2 feet) below ground surface. Many engineers neglect the depth factor (i.e. D Nq = 0) for shallow foundations. This inherently increases the factor of safety. Some site conditions that may negatively effect the depth factor are foundations established at depths equal to or less than 0.3 meters (1 feet) below the ground surface, placement of foundations on fill, and disturbed/ fill soils located above or to the sides of foundations.
********************************
Example #2: Determine allowable bearing capacity of a shallow, 0.3 meter (12-inch) squareisolated footing bearing on saturated cohesive soil. The frost penetration depth is 0.61 meter (2 feet). Structural parameters require the foundation to withstand 4.4 kN (1000 lbs) of force on a 0.3 meter (12-inch) square column.
Given
bearing pressure from building column = 4.4 kN/ (0.3 m x 0.3 m) = 48.9 kN/m2
bearing pressure from building column = 1000 lbs/ (1 ft x 1 ft) = 1000 lbs/ft2
unit weight of saturated soil, gsat= 20.3 kN/m3 (129 lbs/ft3) *see typical g values
unit weight of water, gw= 9.81 kN/m3 (62.4 lbs/ft3) *constant
Cohesion, c = 21.1 kN/m2 (440 lbs/ft2) *from soil testing, see typicalc values
angle of Internal Friction, f = 0 degrees *from soil testing, see typicalf values
footing width, B = 0.3 m (1 ft)
Solution
Try a footing depth, D = 0.61 meters (2 feet), because foundation should be below frost depth.
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Seefactor of safety for more information.
Determine bearing capacity factors Ng, Nc and Nq. See typical bearing capacity factors relating to the soils' angle of internal friction.
- Ng = 0
- Nc = 5.7
- Nq = 1
Solve for ultimate bearing capacity,
Qu = 1.3c Nc + g D Nq + 0.4 g B Ng *square footing eq.
Qu =1.3(21.1kN/m2)5.7+(20.3kN/m3-9.81kN/m3)(0.61m)1+0.4(20.3kN/m3-9.81kN/m3)(0.3m)0
Qu = 163 kN/m2 metric
Qu = 1.3(440lbs/ft2)(5.7) + (129lbs/ft3 - 62.4lbs/ft3)(2ft)(1) + 0.4(129lbs/ft3 - 62.4lbs/ft3)(1ft)(0)
Qu = 3394 lbs/ft2 standard
Solve for allowable bearing capacity,
Qa = Qu
F.S.
Qa = 163 kN/m2 = 54 kN/m2 Qa > 48.9 kN/m2 o.k. metric
3
Qa = 3394lbs/ft2 = 1130 lbs/ft2 Qa > 1000 lbs/ft2 o.k. standard
3
Conclusion
The 0.3 meter (12-inch) isolated square footing shall be 0.61 meters (2 feet) below the ground surface.Other considerations may be required for foundations bearingon moisture sensitive clays, especially for lightly loaded structures such as in this example. Sensitive clays could expand and contract, which could cause structural damage. Clay used as bearing soils may require mitigation such as heavier loads, subgrade removal and replacement below the foundation, or moisture control within the subgrade.
********************************
Example #3: Determine allowable bearing capacity and width for a foundation using the Meyerhof Method. Soils consist of poorly graded sand. Footing must withstand a 144 kN/m2 (1.5 tons/ft2) building pressure.
Given
- bearing pressure from building = 144 kN/m2 (1.5 tons/ft2)
- N Value, N = 10 at 0.3 m (1 ft) depth *from SPT soil testing
- N Value, N = 36 at 0.61 m (2 ft) depth*from SPT soil testing
- N Value, N = 50 at 1.5 m (5 ft) depth *from SPT soil testing
Solution
Try a minimal footing width, B = 0.3 m (B = 1 foot) at a depth, D = 0.61 meter (2 feet). Footings for single family residences are typically 0.3m (1 ft) to 0.61m (2ft) wide. This depth was selected because soil density greatly increases (i.e. higher N-value) at a depth of 0.61 m (2 ft).
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Three is typical for this type of application. Seefactor of safety for more information.
Solve for ultimate bearing capacity
Qu = 31.417(NB + ND) (kN/m2) (metric)
Qu = NB + ND (tons/ft2) (standard)
10 10
Qu = 31.417(36(0.3m) + 36(0.61m)) = 1029 kN/m2(metric)
Qu = 36(1 ft) + 36(2 ft)= 10.8 tons/ft2(standard)
10 10
Solve for allowable bearing capacity,
Qa = Qu
F.S.
Qa = 1029 kN/m2 = 343 kN/m2 Qa > 144kN/m2o.k.(metric)
3
Qa = 10.8 tons/ft2 = 3.6 tons/ft2 Qa > 1.5tons/ft2o.k. (standard)
3
Conclusion
Footing shall be 0.3 meters (1 feet) wide at a depth of 0.61 meters (2 feet) below the ground surface. A footing width of only 0.3 m (1 ft) is most likely insufficient for the structural engineer when designing the footing with the building pressure in this problem.
********************************
Example #4: Determine allowable bearing capacity and diameter of a single driven pile. Pile must withstand a 66.7 kN (15 kips) vertical load.
Given
- vertical column load = 66.7 kN (15 kips or 15,000 lb)
- hom*ogeneous soils in upper 15.2 m (50 ft); silty soil
- unit weight, g = 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lbs/ft3) *from soil testing, see typical g values
- cohesion, c = 47.9 kN/m2 (1000 lb/ft2) *from soil testing, see typicalc values
- angle of internal friction, f = 30 degrees *from soil testing, see typicalf values
- Pile Information
- driven
- steel
- plugged end
Solution
Try a pile depth, D = 1.5 meters (5 feet)
Try pile diameter, B = 0.61 m (2 ft)
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Smaller factors of safety are sometimes used if piles are load tested, or the engineer has sufficient experience with the regional soils.
Determine ultimate end bearing of pile,
Qp = Apqp
Ap = p(B/2)2 = p(0.61m/2)2 = 0.292 m2 metric
Ap=p(B/2)2 = p(2ft/2)2 = 3.14 ft2 standard
qp = gDNq
g = 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lbs/ft3); given soil unit weight
f = 30 degrees; given soil angle of internal friction
B = 0.61 m (2 ft); trial pile width
D = 1.5 m (5 ft); trial depth, may need to increase or decrease depending on capacity
check to see if D < Dc
Dc = 15B = 9.2 m (30 ft); critical depth for medium dense silts.
If D > Dc, then use Dc
Nq = 25; Meyerhof bearing capacityfactor for driven piles, based onf
qp = 19.6 kN/m3(1.5 m)25 = 735 kN/m2 metric
qp = 125 lb/ft3(5 ft)25 = 15,625 lb/ft2 standard
Qp = Apqp = (0.292 m2)(735 kN/m2)= 214.6 kN metric
Qp = Apqp = (3.14 ft2)(15,625 lb/ft2)= 49,063 lb standard
Determine ultimate friction capacity of pile,
Qf = Afqf
Af = pL
p = 2p(0.61m/2) = 1.92 m metric
p = 2p(2 ft/2) = 6.28 ft standard
L = D = 1.5 m (5 ft); length and depth used interchangeably. check Dc as above
Af = 1.92 m(1.5 m) = 2.88 m2 metric
Af = 6.28 ft(5 ft) = 31.4 ft2 standard
qf = cA + ks tan d = cA + kgD tand
k = 0.5; lateral earth pressure coefficientfor piles, value chosen from Broms low density steel
g = 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lb/ft3); given effective soil unit weight. If water table, theng - gw
D = L = 1.5 m (5 ft); pile length. Check to see if D < Dc
Dc = 15B = 9.2 m (30 ft); critical depth for medium dense silts. If D > Dc, then use Dc
d = 20 deg; external friction angle, equation chosen from Broms steel piles
B = 0.61 m (2 ft); selected pile diameter
cA = 0.5c; for clean steel. See adhesion in pile theories above.
= 24 kN/m2 (500 lb/ft2)
qf = 24 kN/m2 + 0.5(19.6 kN/m3)(1.5m)tan 20 = 29.4 kN/m2 metric
qf = 500 lb/ft2 + 0.5(125 lb/ft3)(5ft)tan 20 = 614 lb/ft2standard
Qf = Afqf = 2.88 m2(29.4 kN/m2)= 84.7 kN metric
Qf = Afqf = 31.4 ft2(614 lb/ft2)= 19,280 lb standard
Determine ultimate pile capacity,
Qult = Qp + Qf
Qult = 214.6 kN + 84.7 kN= 299.3 kN metric
Qult = 49,063 lb + 19,280 lb = 68,343 lb standard
Solve for allowable bearing capacity,
Qa = Qult
F.S.
Qa = 299.3 kN = 99.8 kN; Qa > applied load (66.7 kN) o.k.metric
3
Qa = 68,343 lbs = 22,781 lbs Qa > applied load (15 kips) o.k. standard
3
Conclusion
A 0.61 m (2 ft) steel pile shall be plugged and driven 1.5 m (5 feet) below the ground surface. Many engineers neglect the skin friction within the upper 1 to 5 feet of subgrade due to seasonal variations or soil disturbance.Seasonal variations may include freeze/ thaw or effects from water. The end bearing alone (neglect skin friction) is sufficient for this case. Typical methods for increasing the pile capacity are increasing the pile diameter or increasing the embedment depth of the pile.
********************************
Example #5: Determine allowable bearing capacity and diameter of a single driven pile. Pile must withstand a 66.7 kN (15 kips) vertical load.
Given
vertical column load = 66.7 kN (15 kips or 15,000 lb)
upper 1.5 m (5 ft) of soil is a medium dense gravelly sand
- unit weight, g = 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lbs/ft3) *from soil testing, see typical g values
- cohesion, c = 0 *from soil testing, see typicalc values
- angle of internal friction, f = 30 degrees *from soil testing, see typicalf values
soils below 1.5 m (5 ft) of soil is a stiff silty clay
- unit weight, g = 18.9 kN/m3 (120 lbs/ft3)
- cohesion, c = 47.9 kN/m2 (1000 lb/ft2)
- angle of internal friction, f = 0 degrees
Pile Information
- driven
- wood
- closed end
Solution
Try a pile depth, D = 2.4 meters (8 feet)
Try pile diameter, B = 0.61 m (2 ft)
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Smaller factors of safety are sometimes used if piles are load tested, or the engineer has sufficient experience with the regional soils.
Determine ultimate end bearing of pile,
Qp = Apqp
Ap = p(B/2)2 = p(0.61m/2)2 = 0.292 m2 metric
Ap=p(B/2)2 = p(2ft/2)2 = 3.14 ft2 standard
qp = 9c = 9(47.9 kN/m2) = 431.1 kN/m2 metric
qp = 9c = 9(1000 lb/ft2) = 9000 lb/ft2 standard
Qp = Apqp = (0.292 m2)(431.1 kN/m2)= 125.9 kN metric
Qp = Apqp = (3.14 ft2)(9000 lb/ft2)= 28,260 lb standard
Determine ultimate friction capacity of pile,
Qf = pSqfL
p = 2p(0.61m/2) = 1.92 m metric
p = 2p(2 ft/2) = 6.28 ft standard
upper 1.5 m (5 ft) of soil
qfL = [ks tan d]L= [kgD tand]L
k = 1.5; lateral earth pressure coefficientfor piles, value chosen from Broms low density timber
g = 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lb/ft3); given effective soil unit weight. If water table, theng - gw
D = L = 1.5 m (5 ft); segment of pile within this soil strata. Check to see if D < Dc
Dc = 15B = 9.2 m (30 ft); critical depth for medium dense sands. This assumption is conservative, because the soil is gravelly, and this much soil unit weight for a sand would indicate dense soils. If D > Dc, then use Dc
d = f(2/3) = 20 deg; external friction angle, equation chosen from Broms timber piles
B = 0.61 m (2 ft); selected pile diameter
f = 30 deg; given soil angle of internal friction
qfL = [1.5(19.6 kN/m3)(1.5m)tan (20)]1.5 m = 24.1 kN/mmetric
qfL = [1.5(125 lb/ft3)(5ft)tan (20)]5 ft = 1706 lb/ftstandard
soils below 1.5 m (5 ft) of subgrade
qfL =aSu
Suc = 2c = 95.8 kN/m2 (2000 lb/ft2);unconfined compressive strength
c = 47.9 kN/m2 (1000 lb/ft2); cohesion from soil testing (given)
a =
[0.9 + 0.3(Suc - 1)] = 0.3; because Suc > 48 kN/m2, (1 ksf)
Suc
L = 0.91 m (3 ft); segment of pile within this soil strata
qfL = [0.3(95.8 kN/m2)]0.91 m = 26.2 kN/mmetric
qfL = [0.3(2000 lb/ft2)]3 ft = 1800 lb/ft standard
ultimate friction capacity of combined soil layers
Qf = pSqfL
Qf = 1.92 m(24.1 kN/m + 26.2 kN/m) = 96.6 kN metric
Qf = 6.28 ft(1706 lb/ft + 1800 lb/ft) = 22,018 lb standard
Determine ultimate pile capacity,
Qult = Qp + Qf
Qult = 125.9 kN + 96.6 kN= 222.5 kN metric
Qult = 28,260 lb + 22,018 lb = 50,278 lb standard
Solve for allowable bearing capacity,
Qa = Qult
F.S.
Qa = 222.5 kN = 74.2 kN; Qa > applied load (66.7 kN) o.k.metric
3
Qa = 50,275 lbs = 16,758 lbs Qa > applied load (15 kips) o.k. standard
3
Conclusion
Wood pile shall be driven 8 feet below the ground surface. Many engineers neglect the skin friction within the upper 1 to 5 feet of subgrade due to seasonal variations or soil disturbance.Seasonal variations may include freeze/ thaw or effects from water. Notice how the soil properties within the pile tip location is used in the endbearing calculations. End bearing should also consider the soil layer(s) directly beneath this layer. Engineering judgment or a change in design is warranted if subsequent soil layers are weaker than the soils within the vicinity of the pile tip. Typical methods for increasing the pile capacity are increasing the pile diameter or increasing the embedment depth of the pile.
********************************
Please look at additional information and related sources for Bearing Capacityin the publications or software links.Or, post a question in the Geotechnical Forum.
If you found this website useful, then Tell a friend!