Save 10% on All AnalystPrep 2024 Study Packages with Coupon Code BLOG10.
- Payment Plans
- Product List
- Partnerships
- Tutoring
- Pricing
- Payment Plans
- Product List
- Partnerships
- Tutoring
- Pricing
- Try Free Trial
- Try Free Trial
Back
CFA® Exam
Level I
- Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Mock Exams
- Practice Questions
Level II
- Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Mock Exams
- Practice Questions
Level III
- Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Practice Questions
- Mock Exams
ESG
- Study Packages
- Study Notes
- Practice Questions
- Mock Exams
Back
FRM® Exam
Exam Details
- About the Exam
- About your Instructor
Part I
- Part I Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Mock Exams
- Practice Questions
Part II
- Part II Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Mock Exams
- Practice Questions
Back
Actuarial Exams
Exams Details
- About the Exam
- About your Instructor
Exam P
- Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Practice Questions
Exam FM
- Study Packages
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Practice Questions
Back
Graduate Admission
GMAT® Focus Exam
- Study Packages
- About the Exam
- Video Lessons
- Practice Questions
- Quantitative Questions
- Verbal Questions
- Data Insight Questions
- Live Tutoring
Executive Assessment®
- Study Packages
- About the Exam
- About your Instructors
- Video Lessons
- EA Practice Questions
- Quantitative Questions
- Data Sufficiency Questions
- Verbal Questions
- Integrated Reasoning Questions
GRE®
- Study Packages
- About the Exam
- Practice Questions
- Video Lessons
cfa-level-iii
18 Mar 2024
Portfolio managers rely on one of three frameworks for analyzing and managing their portfolios. The three approaches below have advantages and disadvantages, which the analysts and managers must know to make prudent investment decisions.
Asset-only Approach
This approach considers only the asset side of the investor’s balance sheet. Liabilities are not taken into consideration. The most common form of asset-only management is mean-variance optimization. This analytical framework follows the modern portfolio theory to create a mathematically superior portfolio for a given investor’s needs. Increasing the Sharpe ratio of the portfolio within the IPS constraints is the ultimate goal.
Liability-relative Investing
It begins by examining the liabilities of the portfolio and seeks to satisfy those outflows with designated assets. Once the liabilities have been satisfied, the portfolio may shift focus to maximizing the return of the remaining portion not dedicated to paying down specific liabilities, as is the case in portfolio surplus optimization. This manner of investing generally comes down to the importance of having obligations paid on time and often belies a legal requirement to do so.
Goals-based Investing
The goals-based approach is similar to a liability-relative approach in that investors’ future goals are examined (outflows), prioritized, and then satisfied with specific assets within the portfolio. The difference between the two approaches is that goals are not actual legal liabilities but desires.
Also, the lack of an accounting paradigm tends to lend itself to more informal and individual investor-friendly settings. Goals-based investing can lend itself well to portfolio layering. Although it is less than optimal from a modern portfolio theory perspective, it can help build portfolios that clients can understand and stick to.
Relevant Concepts of Risk
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c} \textbf{Approach} & { \textbf{Accounting} \\ \textbf{Orientation} } & {\textbf{Typical} \\ \textbf{Objective}} & {\textbf{Typical} \\ \textbf{Investors} }\\ \hline \text{Asset only} & \text{Models assets} & { \text{Maximize Sharpe} \\ \text{ratio}} & { \text{Foundations,} \\ \text{endowments,} \\ \text{sovereign wealth} \\ \text{funds, individual} \\ \text{investors}} \\ \hline { \text{Liability} \\ \text{driven}} & { \text{Models} \\ \text{liabilities}} & { \text{Pay liabilities, then} \\ \text{maximize surplus} } & { \text{Banks, defined} \\ \text{benefit pension} \\ \text{plans, insurers} } \\ \hline { \text{Goals} \\ \text{based}} & {\text{Models goals}} & {\text{Achieve goals with} \\ \text{minimum specified} \\ \text{probabilities of} \\ \text{success} } & { \text{Individual} \\ \text{investors} } \end{array} $$
Question
Liability-driven investing is often appropriate for investors who may face stringent penalties or consequences for not meeting promised payouts. Which of the following investor types is most likely to use liability-driven investing?
- A sovereign wealth fund.
- A foundation.
- A pension fund.
Solution
The correct answer is C:
Provided that the fund is defined- as a benefit and not a defined contribution, a pension fund is most likely to use LDI. This is because a pension fund is legally obligated to support the retirement of previous firm employees who have met the contractual obligations to earn the pension, a pension they were promised in return for their services.
B is incorrect. A foundation is a charitable organization funded not through ongoing donations but by a portfolio set up to generate income. While foundations may have minimum payout requirements to maintain preferred tax status, the obligations are not legally required as in a pension fund.
A is incorrect. A sovereign wealth fund is a state-owned investment portfolio, generally set up to benefit the country’s citizens. It is not required to make distributions and generally falls under the purview of asset-only investing.
Reading 4: Overview of Asset Allocation
Los 4 (d) Contrast concepts of risk relevant to asset-only, liability-relative, and goals based asset allocation approaches.
Shop CFA® Exam Prep
Offered by AnalystPrep
Level I
Level II
Level III
All Three Levels
Featured
View More
Shop FRM® Exam Prep
FRM Part I
FRM Part II
Learn with Us
Shop Actuarial Exams Prep
Exam P (Probability)
Exam FM (Financial Mathematics)
Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep
GMAT Focus
Executive Assessment
GRE
Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
Nyka Smith
2021-02-18
Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
Badr Moubile
2021-02-13
Very helpfull!
Agustin Olcese
2021-01-27
Excellent explantions, very clear!
Jaak Jay
2021-01-14
Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
sindhushree reddy
2021-01-07
Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.
Trustpilot rating score: 4.7 of 5, based on 61 reviews.
Related Posts